CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 161Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissociative experiences and posttraumatic stress disorder among female victims of criminal assault and rape

Dancu, Constance V., Riggs, David S., Hearst‐Ikeda, Diana, Shoyer, Beth G., Foa, Edna B.·1996·Journal of Traumatic Stress
DOI 10.1002/jts.2490090208
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and dissociative experiences in a sample of 158 recent female assault victims (74 rape, 84 nonsexual assault) and 46 comparison subjects who had not been assaulted within the last year. Results indicated that victims had elevated scores on the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES) as compared to the comparison subjects, but that this elevation was not as high as for other traumatized samples. The level of dissociation reported by assault victims declined significantly over the three month course of the study. DES scores were related to PTSD diagnosis and symptom severity, but only among nonsexual assault victims. In rape victims, there was no correlation between dissociation and PTSD. Recent victims with a history of childhood sexual abuse were significantly more dissociative than those who did not report such a history. These results are discussed with regard to vulnerability factors for developing PTSD subsequent to a criminal assault.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jts.2490090208

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1037/0021-843X.100.3.346 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 161

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dancu, C. V., Riggs, D. S., Hearst‐Ikeda, D., Shoyer, B. G., & Foa, E. B.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
ORCID
Foa, Edna B.
Venue
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-01
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
253-267
ISSN
  • 0894-9867 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6598
DOI
10.1002/jts.2490090208
OpenAlex
W2033008583
Cited by
160
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
13.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 3760 d)
Locations
  • Journal of Traumatic Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH522722-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
dissociation, post-traumatic stress disorder, rape, sexual assault, Dissociative Experiences Scale, child sexual abuse, PTSD symptom severity, vulnerability factors, assault
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Crime, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Rape, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Violence, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review