Cited by 1,013Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaMigration, Health and Trauma

Full and partial posttraumatic stress disorder: findings from a community survey

Murray B. Stein, John R. Walker, Andrea L. Hazen, David R. Forde·1997·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Full and partial posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following trauma exposure were examined in a community sample in order to determine their prevalence and their relative importance and functional significance. METHOD: A standardized telephone interview with a series of trauma probes and a DSM-IV PTSD checklist was administered to a random sample of 1,002 persons in a midsized Midwestern Canadian city. The authors determined current (i.e., 1-months) prevalence rates of full PTSD, i.e., all DSM-IV criteria, and partial PTSD, i.e., fewer than the required number of DSM-IV criterion C symptoms (avoidance/numbing) or criterion D symptoms (increased arousal). Additional questions about interference with functioning were also posed. RESULTS: The estimated prevalence of full PTSD was 2.7% for women and 1.2% for men. The prevalence of partial PTSD was 3.4% for women and 0.3% for men. Interference with work or school was significantly more pronounced in persons with full PTSD than in those with only partial symptoms, although the latter were significantly more occupationally impaired than traumatized persons without PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings in an epidemiologic sample underscore observations from patient and military groups that many traumatized persons suffer from a subsyndromal form of PTSD. These persons with partial PTSD, although somewhat less impaired than persons with the full syndrome, nonetheless exhibit clinically meaningful levels of functional impairment in association with their symptoms. This subthreshold form of PTSD may be especially prevalent in women. Additional study of partial PTSD is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.154.8.1114

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, M. B., Walker, J. R., Hazen, A. L., & Forde, D. R.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
154
Issue
8
Pages
1114-1119
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W1919106491
Cited by
1,013
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 57
FWCI
16.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, subthreshold PTSD, PTSD prevalence, functional disability, occupational impairment, sex differences, trauma exposure, community sample
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Crime, Educational Status, Employment, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Income, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rape, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Telephone, Violence, Prevalence, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Domestic Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review