Cited by 16Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditionsCleft Lip and Palate Research

A novel method for internal nasal valve reconstruction: H‐graft technique

Tastan, Eren, Demirci, Munir, Aydin, Emine, Aydogan, Filiz, Kazikdas, K. Cagdas, Kurkcuoglu, Melih, Ugur, M. Birol·2011·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a novel method for internal nasal valve reconstruction that enables lateralization of the superior segment of upper lateral cartilages (ULC) from the septum to a greater extent than the spreader graft method with lateral wall support. Study Design: Prospective, controlled study set at a tertiary medical center. Methods: The study group was composed of 19 consecutive patients with pure internal nasal valve dysfunction who underwent surgery with the presented technique. All patients completed the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) tests preoperatively and at 12th month postoperative control to compare functional and aesthetic outcomes. Results: Based upon pre‐ and postoperative calculations made using NOSE scores, there was significant improvement regarding nasal blockage or congestion, troubled breathing and sleeping, and air through nose during exercise, respectively (P< .05). There were no aesthetic changes encountered by the patient when pre‐ and postoperative ROE scores were compared (P> .05). Conclusions: The H shape of the graft not only improves the graft stability on dorsal septum but also has the advantage of combining the spreader and the splay effects. Current data from this prospective study suggest that this technique may be used in the surgical treatment of internal nasal valve dysfunction. Laryngoscope, 2011

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.21437

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tastan, E., Demirci, M., Aydin, E., Aydogan, F., Kazikdas, K. C., Kurkcuoglu, M., & Ugur, M. B.
Affiliations
Ministry of Health (TR)
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-04
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
480-486
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W1986670794
Cited by
16
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Keywords
upper lateral cartilages, nasal obstruction, spreader grafts, nasal valve dysfunction, graft stability, functional and aesthetic outcomes
MeSH terms
Cartilage, Endoscopy, Esthetics, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Nasal Septum, Prospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Nasal Obstruction, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Nasal Cartilages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review