Cited by 162Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCleft Lip and Palate Research

The Spreader Flap in Primary Rhinoplasty

Gruber, Ronald P., Park, Eddie, Newman, Jennifer, Berkowitz, Lawrence, Oneal, Robert·2007·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a primary rhinoplasty that requires a humpectomy, the dorsal aspect of the upper lateral cartilages is commonly discarded. Many of these patients need spreader grafts to reconstruct the middle third of the nose. However, it is possible to reconstruct the upper lateral cartilages into "spreader flaps" that act much like spreader grafts. METHODS: A tunnel is created on the underside of the upper lateral cartilage, which is released from the cartilaginous septum and also from its attachment to the nasal bone (medially). It is then rolled on itself to make a spreader flap, which is secured with sutures. Scoring along the dorsal edge of the upper lateral cartilage may be necessary. The flap is then secured to the dorsal edge of the reduced dorsal septum. RESULTS: In 21 patients who underwent an open approach (and four patients who underwent the closed approach), the spreader flap almost always reconstructed the middle third of the nose. It was easy to execute in the open approach but difficult in the closed approach. At surgery, two patients undergoing the open approach and one patient undergoing the closed approach needed spreader grafts because the flaps were too narrow. Postoperatively, only one patient (operated on by the open approach) exhibited inadequate nasal width. CONCLUSIONS: Spreader grafts are the standard for reconstructing the middle third of the nose. However, the spreader flap avoids harvesting and carving cartilage for those grafts. In the open approach, the technique is easy to execute. Conclusions could not be drawn regarding the long-term success with the closed approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.prs.0000259198.42852.d4

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synthetic materials can be useful in revision surgeries, especially where there is inadequate cartilage.

    “The synthetic materials can be useful in revision surgeries, especially where there is inadequate cartilage [27, 29].”
  • Auto-spreader flap avoids harvesting and carving cartilage for grafting from other locations.

    “This technique avoids harvesting and carving cartilage for grafting from other locations [29, 36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruber, R. P., Park, E., Newman, J., Berkowitz, L., & Oneal, R.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2007-05
Volume
119
Issue
6
Pages
1903-1910
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995073437
Cited by
162
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Keywords
primary rhinoplasty, spreader grafts, upper lateral cartilages, nasal reconstruction, open rhinoplasty, closed rhinoplasty, nasal width
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cartilage, Esthetics, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Nasal Bone, Nasal Septum, Nose, Rhinoplasty, Risk Factors, Surgical Flaps, Suture Techniques, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review