Cited by 9Voice and Speech DisordersPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

A Deep‐Learning Model for Multi‐class Audio Classification of Vocal Fold Pathologies in Office Stroboscopy

Open access
Kim, Yeo E., Dobko, Maria, Li, Haomiao, Shao, Tianlan, Periyakoil, Preethi, Tipton, Courtney, Colasacco, Christine, Serpedin, Aisha +5 more·2025·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a deep‐learning classifier trained on voice data extracted from videolaryngostroboscopy recordings, differentiating between three different vocal fold (VF) states: healthy (HVF), unilateral paralysis (UVFP), and VF lesions, including benign and malignant pathologies. Methods: Patients with UVFP ( n = 105), VF lesions ( n = 63), and HVF ( n = 41) were retrospectively identified. Voice samples were extracted from stroboscopic videos (Pentax Laryngeal Strobe Model 9400), including sustained /i/ phonation, pitch glide, and /i/ sniff task. Extracted audio files were converted into Mel‐spectrograms. Voice samples were independently divided into training (80%), validation (10%), and test (10%) by patient. Pretrained ResNet18 models were trained to classify (1) HVF and pathological VF (lesions and UVFP), and (2) HVF, UVFP, and VF lesions. Both classifiers were further validated on an external dataset consisting of 12 UVFP, 13 VF lesions, and 15 HVF patients. Model performances were evaluated by accuracy and F1‐score. Results: When evaluated on a hold‐out test set, the binary classifier demonstrated stronger performance compared to the multi‐class classifier (accuracy 83% vs. 40%; F1‐score 0.90 vs. 0.36). When evaluated on an external dataset, the binary classifier achieved an accuracy of 63% and F1‐score of 0.48, compared to 35% and 0.25 for the multi‐class classifier. Conclusions: Deep‐learning classifiers differentiating HVF, UVFP, and VF lesions were developed using voice data from stroboscopic videos. Although healthy and pathological voice were differentiated with moderate accuracy, multi‐class classification lowered model performance. The model performed poorly on an external dataset. Voice captured in stroboscopic videos may have limited diagnostic value, though further studies are needed. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope , 135:2428–2436, 2025

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.32036

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laryngeal imaging is the reference standard for laryngeal evaluation, but access depends on practitioner expertise, equipment availability, and cost, and neuromuscular disorders may present without visible structural lesions.

    “Laryngeal imaging—including videolaryngoscopy, stroboscopy, and high-speed videoendoscopy—represents the reference standard for laryngeal evaluation [9,16,17,18]; however, access depends on practitioner expertise, equipment availability, and cost, while neuromuscular disorders may present without visible structural lesions, complicating diagnosis [19].”

    From Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Disorders: An Integrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction (page not provided) calls videolaryngostroboscopy a mainstay of objective laryngeal evaluation and says access varies by region and is concentrated in specialist practices. It does not establish equipment availability or cost as access barriers, address all three named imaging methods as a group, or say that neuromuscular disorders may lack visible structural lesions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Comparative evidence suggests that architectural families are better suited to specific data regimes than any universally optimal model.

    “Comparative evidence suggests that architectural families are better suited to specific data regimes than any universally optimal model [16,26,56,61].”

    From Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Disorders: An Integrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results section (page unavailable) reports that an MLP performed best for binary classification, while a random forest performed best for multiclass classification. The Discussion also reports that dataset size affected performance. These findings support task- and data-dependent performance in this study, but do not establish that architectural families are generally suited to particular data regimes or rule out a universally optimal model. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In some cases, accuracy and sensitivity decrease by about 10 to 30 percentage points under external validation conditions.

    “In some cases, accuracy and sensitivity decrease by about 10 to 30 percentage points under these conditions [16,64].”

    From Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Disorders: An Integrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results (Performance of Deep Learning Neural Networks; page unavailable) show that binary-classifier accuracy fell by 15–20 percentage points on the external dataset compared with the hold-out test set. The passage does not give a comparable numerical change in sensitivity, and some multi-class accuracy results did not decline, so the full claim is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CNNs have been widely applied to vocal spectrograms and laryngoscopic images, while recurrent and bidirectional architectures capture temporal dynamics of pathological phonation.

    “Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been widely applied to vocal spectrograms and laryngoscopic images [24,33], while recurrent and bidirectional architectures capture temporal dynamics of pathological phonation [16,56,57].”
  • Across the 88 included studies, only 7 studies performed both internal and external validation.

    “Across the 88 included studies, only 7 studies performed both internal and external validation [12,16,26,54,64,65,69].”

    From Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Laryngeal Disorders: An Integrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [16]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Loshchilov I, Hutter F. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:171105101 2017.
  2. [31]Lundberg S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:170507874 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y. E., Dobko, M., Li, H., Shao, T., Periyakoil, P., Tipton, C., Colasacco, C., Serpedin, A., Elemento, O., Sabuncu, M., Pitman, M., Sulica, L., & Rameau, A.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Cornell Tech (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA)
Corresponding author
Rameau, Anaïs
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-02-05
Volume
135
Issue
7
Pages
2428-2436
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W4407176216
Cited by
9
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • eCommons (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (K76AG079040)
  • Common Fund (OT2 OD032720)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
vocal fold pathology, videolaryngostroboscopy, unilateral vocal fold paralysis, vocal fold lesions, voice analysis, Mel spectrogram, ResNet-18, external validation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Laryngeal Diseases, Laryngoscopy, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Video Recording, Vocal Cord Paralysis, Vocal Cords, Stroboscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review