Cited by 1,818Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisVoice and Speech Disorders

The Geneva Minimalistic Acoustic Parameter Set (GeMAPS) for Voice Research and Affective Computing

Open access
Eyben, Florian, Scherer, Klaus R., Schuller, Bjorn W., Sundberg, Johan, Andre, Elisabeth, Busso, Carlos, Devillers, Laurence Y., Epps, Julien +3 more·2016·IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing

Abstract

Work on voice sciences over recent decades has led to a proliferation of acoustic parameters that are used quite selectively and are not always extracted in a similar fashion. With many independent teams working in different research areas, shared standards become an essential safeguard to ensure compliance with state-of-the-art methods allowing appropriate comparison of results across studies and potential integration and combination of extraction and recognition systems. In this paper we propose a basic standard acoustic parameter set for various areas of automatic voice analysis, such as paralinguistic or clinical speech analysis. In contrast to a large brute-force parameter set, we present a minimalistic set of voice parameters here. These were selected based on a) their potential to index affective physiological changes in voice production, b) their proven value in former studies as well as their automatic extractability, and c) their theoretical significance. The set is intended to provide a common baseline for evaluation of future research and eliminate differences caused by varying parameter sets or even different implementations of the same parameters. Our implementation is publicly available with the openSMILE toolkit. Comparative evaluations of the proposed feature set and large baseline feature sets of INTERSPEECH challenges show a high performance of the proposed set in relation to its size.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taffc.2015.2457417

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our model should capture certain acoustic and prosodic features such as mean fundamental frequency (F0), mean speech intensity, loudness, and pitch range.

    “Some of these features, such as the mean of the fundamental frequency (F0), mean speech intensity, loudness, as well as pitch range [46], should thus be captured by our model.”
  • Short-term spectral, prosodic, and energy features of speech carry affective information.

    “Research has shown that short-term spectral, prosodic, and energy features of speech carry affective information [121].”
  • Since there is no consensus in the literature over a 'universal' handcrafted feature set with superior performance, many recent studies have applied a 'bruteforce' approach, resulting in a large number of features per utterance.

    “Since there is no consensus in the literature over a 'universal' handcrafted feature set with superior performance [121], many recent studies have applied a 'bruteforce' approach, resulting in a large number of features per utterance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eyben, F., Scherer, K. R., Schuller, B. W., Sundberg, J., Andre, E., Busso, C., Devillers, L. Y., Epps, J., Laukka, P., Narayanan, S. S., & Truong, K. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Published
2016-04-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
190-202
ISSN
1949-3045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2239141610
Cited by
1,818
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 229 · 2025: 235 · 2024: 202 · 2023: 218 · 2022: 214 · 2021: 192 · 2020: 161 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 12
FWCI
108.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Community's seventh Framework Programme (230331-PROPEREMO)
  • National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) Affective Sciences
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (51NF40-104897)
  • University of Geneva
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
voice analysis, affective computing, paralinguistic features, openSMILE, feature standardization, automatic feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review