The effects of organic and mineral fertilizers on carbon sequestration, soil properties, and crop yields from a long-term field experiment under a Swiss conventional farming system
Open accessAbstract
The effects of mineral fertilizers and organic amendments on soil properties, carbon (C) sequestration, and crop yields are studied in a 37‐year field experiment, Phosphorus–Potassium‐balanced design, in Switzerland. Treatments included a control (mineral fertilization) without nitrogen (N) fertilizers (Min‐N0) and with optimal N (Min‐Nopt) and 5 organic amendments (green manure [Gm], cereal straw [Str], fresh cattle manure in 2 doses 35 and 70 t ha−1 [Ma35 and Ma70] and cattle slurry [Slu]) all receiving the same optimal N fertilization as Min‐Nopt. All mineral and organic treatments received optimum P–K fertilization. Nitrogen fertilization (Min‐Nopt vs. Min‐N0) increased soil organic C, microbial activity, and microporosity but decreased pH, magnesium, and macroporosity. All organic treatments with optimal mineral N resulted in higher soil organic C content compared with Min‐Nopt, however, these effects were significant only for the highest dose of manure. The organic amendments supplied 25% to 80% additional C input to the soil compared with Min‐Nopt, and their amendment‐C retention coefficients ranged from 1.6% (Gm) to 13.6% (Ma70). Chemical, physical, and biological soil properties were not or slightly significantly different among organic treatments. Nevertheless, soils fertilized with farmyard manure produced generally higher grain yield (up to 7.3%) compared with Min‐Nopt whereas the opposite effect was noted for Gm (−2.2%) and Str (−5.2%) treatments due to their negative effect on N availability. In conclusion, Gm and Str treatments were as effectives as Ma35 and Slu treatments to prevent soil degradation but required higher chemical fertilizer to maintain crop yield.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Losses of soil organic matter were observed in arable fields that received no organic amendments.
“Regarding SOM, a general need for the application of OAs to agricultural soils is given, since losses of SOM were observed in arable fields that received no OAs (Kätterer et al., 2011;Maltas et al., 2018;Chen et al., 2018).”
From Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides (2021) · cites this paper as Maltas et al., 2018
Cites
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071 · see citing works
Paustian, K., Lehmann, J., Ogle, S., Reay, D., Robertson, G. P., & Smith, P. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17174 · Cited by 2,213 · see citing works
Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes
Ellert, B. H., & Bettany, J. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss95-075 · Cited by 1,686 · see citing works
Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003
Bellamy, P. H., Loveland, P. J., Bradley, R. I., Lark, R. M., & Kirk, G. J. D. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04038 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
POEPLAU, C., DON, A., VESTERDAL, L., LEIFELD, J., VAN WESEMAEL, B., SCHUMACHER, J., & GENSIOR, A. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02408.x · Cited by 918 · see citing works
Crop and Soil Productivity Response to Corn Residue Removal
Wilhelm, W. W., Johnson, J. M. F., Hatfield, J. L., Voorhees, W. B., & Linden, D. R. (2004) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2004.0001 · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Hydraulic and Thermal Properties of a Sandy Soil as Influenced by Incorporation of Sewage Sludge
Gupta, S. C., Dowdy, R. H., & Larson, W. E. (1977) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100030035x · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The immobilization of nitrogen by straw decomposing in soil.
Cheshire, M. V., Bedrock, C. N., Williams, B. L., Chapman, S. J., Solntseva, I., & Thomsen, I. (1999) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00238.x · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Siedt, M., Schäffer, A., Smith, K. E. C., Nabel, M., Roß-Nickoll, M., & van Dongen, J. T. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maltas, A., Kebli, H., Oberholzer, H. R., Weisskopf, P., & Sinaj, S.
- Affiliations
- Agroscope (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Sinaj, Sokrat
- Venue
- Land Degradation & Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-14
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 926-938
- ISSN
- 1085-3278 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-145X
- OpenAlex
- W2793129704
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 15.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Land Degradation and Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Agroscope
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- organic fertilizer, mineral fertilizers, soil carbon sequestration, soil organic carbon, crop yield, green manure, cereal straw, cattle manure, cattle slurry, nitrogen fertilization, soil properties, soil degradation, conventional farming, long-term field experiment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review