Cited by 31Laser Material Processing TechniquesNonlinear Optical Materials StudiesGlass properties and applications

Ultrafast Laser Writing in Different Types of Silica Glass

Open access
Lei, Yuhao, Wang, Huijun, Skuja, Linards, Kühn, Bodo, Franz, Bernhard, Svirko, Yuri, Kazansky, Peter. G.·2023·Laser & Photonics Reviews

Abstract

It is demonstrated that ultrafast laser writing in silica glass depends on the grade of silica glass associated with the method of its manufacture. Moreover, laser‐written modifications, in particular birefringent modifications, reveal a dependence on the geometry of writing, that is, the modification strength of voxels is smaller than that of single line structures and multi‐line scanned areas, which can be explained by free carrier diffusion and reduced electric field in scanning writing. The retardance of scanned birefringent region produced in the regime of anisotropic nanopores formation in silica glass manufactured by vapor axial deposition (VAD) is about five times higher than that in an electrically fused sample at the same laser writing parameters, while the difference in retardance of a nanograting based modification in synthetic and fused silica is only about 10%. The phenomenon is interpreted in terms of the higher concentration of oxygen deficient centers in the electrically fused silica glass, which can confine self‐trapped holes and prevent the nanopores formation. Improvement of high transmission optical elements is demonstrated in the VAD sample, and low cost multiplexed optical data storage with higher capacity and readout accuracy is realized in the electrically fused silica glass.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lpor.202200978

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phase voxels are femtosecond-laser-induced isotropic modifications with locally altered refractive index and minimal optical scattering.

    “Phase voxels are femtosecond-laser-induced isotropic modifications with locally altered RI and minimal optical scattering.”

    From Laser writing in glass for dense, fast and efficient archival data storage (2026) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results and Discussion section reports femtosecond-laser-written type 1 modifications with an isotropic refractive-index increase, supporting the core description. It does not identify these as “phase voxels” or establish that the isotropic modifications have minimal optical scattering; its high-transmission discussion concerns birefringent type X structures instead. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. A. Vogel, J. Noack, G. Hüttman, G. Paltauf, Appl. Phys. B 2005, 81, 1015.
  2. A. Ródenas, M. Gu, G. Corrielli, P. Paiè, S. John, A. K. Kar, R. Osellame, Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 105.
  3. X.-L. Zhang, F. Yu, Z.-G. Chen, Z.-N. Tian, Q.-D. Chen, H.-B. Sun, G. Ma, Nat. Photonics 2022, 16, 390.
  4. K. Sugioka, Y. Cheng, Light: Sci. Appl. 2014, 3, e149.
  5. A. Marcinkevičius, S. Juodkazis, M. Watanabe, M. Miwa, S. Matsuo, H. Misawa, J. Nishii, Opt. Lett. 2001, 26, 277.
  6. Y. Bellouard, A. Said, M. Dugan, P. Bado, Opt. Express 2004, 12, 2120.
  7. C. Hnatovsky, R. Taylor, E. Simova, V. Bhardwaj, D. Rayner, P. Corkum, Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 1867.
  8. E. Glezer, M. Milosavljevic, L. Huang, R. Finlay, T.-H. Her, J. P. Callan, E. Mazur, Opt. Lett. 1996, 21, 2023.
  9. P. Zijlstra, J. W. Chon, M. Gu, Nature 2009, 459, 410.
  10. S. M. Eaton, H. Zhang, P. R. Herman, F. Yoshino, L. Shah, J. Bovatsek, A. Y. Arai, Opt. Express 2005, 13, 4708.
  11. Y. Liao, J. Ni, L. Qiao, M. Huang, Y. Bellouard, K. Sugioka, Y. Cheng, Optica 2015, 2, 329.
  12. B. Zhang, D. Tan, Z. Wang, X. Liu, B. Xu, M. Gu, L. Tong, J. Qiu, Light: Sci. Appl. 2021, 10, 93.
  13. K. Sun, D. Tan, X. Fang, X. Xia, D. Lin, J. Song, Y. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Gu, Y. Yue, Science 2022, 375, 307.
  14. D. Wei, C. Wang, H. Wang, X. Hu, D. Wei, X. Fang, Y. Zhang, D. Wu, Y. Hu, J. Li, Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 596.
  15. T. Xu, K. Switkowski, X. Chen, S. Liu, K. Koynov, H. Yu, H. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Sheng, W. Krolikowski, Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 591.
  16. A. Mermillod-Blondin, C. Mauclair, A. Rosenfeld, J. Bonse, I. V. Hertel, E. Audouard, R. Stoian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 021921.
  17. M. Lancry, B. Poumellec, J. Canning, K. Cook, J. C. Poulin, F. Brisset, Laser Photonics Rev. 2013, 7, 953.
  18. E. Casamenti, S. Pollonghini, Y. Bellouard, Opt. Express 2021, 29, 35054.
  19. R. Brueckner, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1970, 5, 123.
  20. K. M. Davis, K. Miura, N. Sugimoto, K. Hirao, Opt. Lett. 1996, 21, 1729.
  21. Y. Shimotsuma, P. G. Kazansky, J. Qiu, K. Hirao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 247405.
  22. V. R. Bhardwaj, E. Simova, P. P. Rajeev, C. Hnatovsky, R. S. Taylor, D. M. Rayner, P. B. Corkum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 057404.
  23. M. Beresna, M. Gecevičius, P. G. Kazansky, T. Gertus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 201101.
  24. C. Hernández-García, A. Turpin, J. San Román, A. Picón, R. Drevin- skas, A. Cerkauskaite, P. G. Kazansky, C. G. Durfee, Í. J. Sola, Optica 2017, 4, 520.
  25. Y. Fang, M. Han, P. Ge, Z. Guo, X. Yu, Y. Deng, C. Wu, Q. Gong, Y. Liu, Nat. Photonics 2021, 15, 115.
  26. Y. Shimotsuma, M. Sakakura, P. G. Kazansky, M. Beresna, J. Qiu, K. Miura, K. Hirao, Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 4039.
  27. J. Zhang, M. Gecevicius, M. Beresna, P. G. Kazansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 033901.
  28. M. Sakakura, Y. Lei, L. Wang, Y. H. Yu, P. G. Kazansky, Light: Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 15.
  29. H. Wang, Y. Lei, L. Wang, M. Sakakura, Y. Yu, G. Shayeganrad, P. G. Kazansky, Laser Photonics Rev. 2022, 16, 2100563.
  30. Y. Lei, M. Sakakura, L. Wang, Y. Yu, H. Wang, G. Shayeganrad, P. G. Kazansky, Optica 2021, 8, 1365.
  31. M. Lancry, N. Groothoff, S. Guizard, W. Yang, B. Poumellec, P. Kazan- sky, J. Canning, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2009, 355, 1057.
  32. M. Lancry, J. Canning, K. Cook, M. Heili, D. Neuville, B. Poumellec, Opt. Mater. Express 2016, 6, 321.
  33. F. Zimmermann, M. Lancry, A. Plech, S. Richter, B. H. Babu, B. Poumellec, A. Tünnermann, S. Nolte, Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 1161.
  34. S. Richter, C. Miese, S. Döring, F. Zimmermann, M. J. Withford, A. Tünnermann, S. Nolte, Opt. Mater. Express 2013, 3, 1161.
  35. S. Fedotov, R. Drevinskas, S. Lotarev, A. Lipatiev, M. Beresna, A. Čerkauskait ė, V. Sigaev, P. Kazansky, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 071905.
  36. V. Niziev, A. Nesterov, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1999, 32, 1455.
  37. A. Patel, V. T. Tikhonchuk, J. Zhang, P. G. Kazansky, Laser Photonics Rev. 2017, 11, 1600290.
  38. A. Collins, D. Rostohar, C. Prieto, Y. Chan, Opt. Lasers Eng. 2014, 60, 18.
  39. E. M. Dianov, P. Kazanskiȋ, D. Y. Stepanov, Quantum Electron. 1989, 19, 575.
  40. D. Z. Anderson, V. Mizrahi, J. E. Sipe, Opt. Lett. 1991, 16, 796.
  41. L. Skuja, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1998, 239, 16.
  42. R. Stoian, K. Mishchik, G. Cheng, C. Mauclair, C. D'Amico, J.-P. Colombier, M. Zamfirescu, Opt. Mater. Express 2013, 3, 1755.
  43. D. L. Griscom, Phys. Rev. B 1989, 40, 4224.
  44. D. L. Griscom, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 2601.
  45. P. F. Kashaykin, A. L. Tomashuk, M. Y. Salgansky, A. N. Guryanov, E. M. Dianov, J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 213104.
  46. J. W. Fleming, D. L. Wood, Appl. Opt. 1983, 22, 3102.
  47. L. Skuja, M. Hirano, H. Hosono, K. Kajihara, Phys. Status Solidi C 2005, 2, 15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lei, Y., Wang, H., Skuja, L., Kühn, B., Franz, B., Svirko, Y., & Kazansky, P. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Institute of Solid State Physics, UL (LV)
  • Heraeus (Germany) (DE)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
  • Lei, Yuhao
  • Kazansky, Peter. G.
Venue
Laser & Photonics Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-02-16
Volume
17
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 1863-8880 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-8899
OpenAlex
W4321032982
Cited by
31
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Laser & Photonics Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • E-resource repository of the University of Latvia (University of Latvia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council (789116)
  • Academy of Finland (343393, 320166)
  • Microsoft (ProjectSilica)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Glass properties and applications
Keywords
ultrafast laser writing, fused silica, nanopores, vapor axial deposition, oxygen-deficient centers, nanogratings, phase retardation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review