Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tailoring Ultra‐High‐Order Optical Skyrmions

Zeng, Xinji, Fang, Jing, Wu, Haijun, Wang, Jinwen, Chen, Yun, Zhou, Yongkun, Yang, Xin, Wang, Chengyuan, Wei, Dong, Chen, Haixia, Gao, Hong, Shen, Yijie·2025·Laser & Photonics Reviews

Abstract

As quasiparticles with topological spin textures, skyrmions have drawn considerable interest from the condensed matter and structured wave communities, offering potential for next‐generation high‐density, robust information technologies. Nevertheless, generating high‐order skyrmions remains a significant challenge, as they have not been reliably observed in any physical system. Here, the method is proposed to create and control ultra‐high‐order skyrmions (skyrmion number up to 400 th ) in a structured light system. The topological state transition between bimerons and skyrmions is also experimentally controlled, the transverse size of an arbitrary‐order skyrmionic beam is tailored independently of the topological number, and ensure the topological stability upon propagation. This work provides solutions for topologically resilient communication and memory, significantly enhancing information capacity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lpor.202500732

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Theoretical concept of ring-shaped skyrmions and bimerons, with columns from left to right representing N´ eel, Bloch, and Anti-types. Top row, skyrmion maps and stokes vectors, the central black and peripheral white represent left - and right - handed circular polarization respectively; bottom row, the bimeron maps and stokes vectors, the central blue and peripheral red represent vertical and horizontal linear polarization respectively. Colorbar is based on the Poincar´ e sphere's azimuth angle Ψ and spatial angle χ . The right column presents the maps of ultra-high-order skyrmions and bimerons along with their local magnified images. The main feature of the ring-shaped quasiparticles is that the center is no longer point-like but disk-like. The simulations are all synthesized by Laguerre-Gaussian beams with opposite unequalorder orbital angular momentum.
Figure 1 Theoretical concept of ring-shaped skyrmions and bimerons, with columns from left to right representing N´ eel, Bloch, and Anti-types. Top row, skyrmion maps and stokes vectors, the central black and peripheral white represent left - and right - handed circular polarization respectively; bottom row, the bimeron maps and stokes vectors, the central blue and peripheral red represent vertical and horizontal linear polarization respectively. Colorbar is based on the Poincar´ e sphere's azimuth angle Ψ and spatial angle χ . The right column presents the maps of ultra-high-order skyrmions and bimerons along with their local magnified images. The main feature of the ring-shaped quasiparticles is that the center is no longer point-like but disk-like. The simulations are all synthesized by Laguerre-Gaussian beams with opposite unequalorder orbital angular momentum.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Experimental setup, ECDL: external cavity diode laser, H: half-wave plate, PBS: polarization beam splitter, SMF: single mode fiber, BS: beam splitter, SLM: spatial light modulator, F1,F2: lens with f = 300 mm, M: mirror, A: aperture, CCD: movable charge-coupled camera, inset is the multiplexing grating. The Stokes parameters are measured using a polarizing analysis setup (not shown here) consisting of a HWP, a quarter-wave plate (QWP), and a PBS.
Figure 2 Experimental setup, ECDL: external cavity diode laser, H: half-wave plate, PBS: polarization beam splitter, SMF: single mode fiber, BS: beam splitter, SLM: spatial light modulator, F1,F2: lens with f = 300 mm, M: mirror, A: aperture, CCD: movable charge-coupled camera, inset is the multiplexing grating. The Stokes parameters are measured using a polarizing analysis setup (not shown here) consisting of a HWP, a quarter-wave plate (QWP), and a PBS.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Comparison of experimental results of disk-shaped and ring-shaped high order skyrmions. The left is 11th-order skyrmions, (a1), (a2) , map and intensity distribution of superimposed modes: R 11 + L 0 and R 8 + L -3 ; (b1), (b2) , radial intensity curves of the two superimposed modes; (c1) , topological number variation with integration radius ( × 10 -3 m). The right is 19th-order skyrmions, captions for the corresponding letters are the same as aforementioned, two superimposed modes are R 19 + L 0 and R 14 + L -5 . R l and L l is the lth RCP and LCP LG mode, respectively. The beam waist w = 0 . 3 mm.
Figure 3 Comparison of experimental results of disk-shaped and ring-shaped high order skyrmions. The left is 11th-order skyrmions, (a1), (a2) , map and intensity distribution of superimposed modes: R 11 + L 0 and R 8 + L -3 ; (b1), (b2) , radial intensity curves of the two superimposed modes; (c1) , topological number variation with integration radius ( × 10 -3 m). The right is 19th-order skyrmions, captions for the corresponding letters are the same as aforementioned, two superimposed modes are R 19 + L 0 and R 14 + L -5 . R l and L l is the lth RCP and LCP LG mode, respectively. The beam waist w = 0 . 3 mm.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Experimental results of ultra-high-order skyrmions. (a1)-(a6) is 27th, 50th, 100th, 200th, 300th and 400th-order skyrmion with each local magnified image, respectively; (b) is topological number variation with integration radius ( × 10 -3 m) of each ultra-high-order skyrmion with local magnified plots, the gray arrow indicates the trend of curve changes. The beam waist is the same as Fig.3.
Figure 4 Experimental results of ultra-high-order skyrmions. (a1)-(a6) is 27th, 50th, 100th, 200th, 300th and 400th-order skyrmion with each local magnified image, respectively; (b) is topological number variation with integration radius ( × 10 -3 m) of each ultra-high-order skyrmion with local magnified plots, the gray arrow indicates the trend of curve changes. The beam waist is the same as Fig.3.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Experimental results of three different types 1st-order PB beams; The top row is N´ eel type, middle row is Bloch type, and bottom row is Anti-type; (a1)-(a3) are polarization distributions, insets are Stokes parameters; (b1-b3) are bimeronic maps; (c1)-(c3) are Stokes vectors distributions. Parameters used are: T = 0 . 25 mm, R 1 = 5 T, R 2 = 4 T .
Figure 5 Experimental results of three different types 1st-order PB beams; The top row is N´ eel type, middle row is Bloch type, and bottom row is Anti-type; (a1)-(a3) are polarization distributions, insets are Stokes parameters; (b1-b3) are bimeronic maps; (c1)-(c3) are Stokes vectors distributions. Parameters used are: T = 0 . 25 mm, R 1 = 5 T, R 2 = 4 T .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 (a1)-(a5) : Experimental results of 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 10th, 20th-order PB beams, parameters are the same as Fig.5; (b) , topological number variation with integration radius ( × 10 -3 m), the gray arrow indicates the trend of curve changes; (c) , radial normalized intensity, inset are ring widths of different orders; (d1), (d2) , results of 50th and 100th order perfect skyrmions and local magnified images, with T = 0 . 1 mm, R 1 = 17 T, R 2 = 14 T , l 1 = 30 , 60 , l 2 = -20 , -40.
Figure 6 (a1)-(a5) : Experimental results of 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 10th, 20th-order PB beams, parameters are the same as Fig.5; (b) , topological number variation with integration radius ( × 10 -3 m), the gray arrow indicates the trend of curve changes; (c) , radial normalized intensity, inset are ring widths of different orders; (d1), (d2) , results of 50th and 100th order perfect skyrmions and local magnified images, with T = 0 . 1 mm, R 1 = 17 T, R 2 = 14 T , l 1 = 30 , 60 , l 2 = -20 , -40.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 7 Propagation properties of 1st-order N´ eel-type PB beam (the top row of Fig.5) in z direction. (a) , changes of polarization during propagation; (b) , changes of bimeronic maps; (c) , topological number variation at different z, the gray arrow indicates the trend of curve changes. Data was collected at positions z=0 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, 15 cm and 20 cm.
Figure 7 Propagation properties of 1st-order N´ eel-type PB beam (the top row of Fig.5) in z direction. (a) , changes of polarization during propagation; (b) , changes of bimeronic maps; (c) , topological number variation at different z, the gray arrow indicates the trend of curve changes. Data was collected at positions z=0 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, 15 cm and 20 cm.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 The experimental Stokes parameters S 0 -S 3 of the 400th-order skyrmion generated by LG beams, along with local magnified images of S 1 and S 2.
Figure 8 The experimental Stokes parameters S 0 -S 3 of the 400th-order skyrmion generated by LG beams, along with local magnified images of S 1 and S 2.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 9 The experimental Stokes parameters S 0 -S 3 of the 100th-order skyrmion generated by PV beams, along with local magnified images of S 1 and S 2.
Figure 9 The experimental Stokes parameters S 0 -S 3 of the 100th-order skyrmion generated by PV beams, along with local magnified images of S 1 and S 2.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1016/0029-5582(62)90775-7 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.1166767 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nature09124 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s42254-020-0203-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/sciadv.adj9373 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nmat4223 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.31 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s41467-019-14095-0 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/s41586-018-0745-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/s41524-020-00435-y · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41567-019-0476-x · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41565-021-00954-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/s41467-021-21250-z · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195428 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41567-019-0487-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1515/nanoph-2023-0741 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/lpor.202300155 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1364/OL.431122 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/adpr.202200350 · DOI
  20. 10.1364/AOP.547634 · DOI
  21. 10.1063/5.0265736 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41566-019-0538-8 · DOI
  23. 10.1063/5.0192239 · DOI
  24. 10.1364/PRJ.499485 · DOI
  25. 10.1364/OPTICA.540469 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.153601 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.013601 · DOI
  28. 10.1063/1.3154549 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c01640 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.3788/COL202523.032701 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41566-023-01360-4 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.240801 · DOI
  33. 10.1088/2058-9565/ac120a · DOI
  34. 10.1364/PRJ.559202 · DOI
  35. 10.1364/OL.38.000534 · DOI
  36. 10.1364/OL.40.000597 · DOI
  37. 10.1364/OL.44.005614 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41377-019-0194-2 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1088/1367-2630/ad56be · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41566-021-00780-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1116/5.0016007 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.193803 · DOI
  43. 10.1364/OL.38.004919 · DOI
  44. B.Wang Z.Che C.Cheng C.Tong L.Shi Y.Shen K. Y.Bliokh J.Zi arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.085152024.
  45. 10.1364/OE.439716 · DOI
  46. 10.1364/OL.479915 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41586-021-04338-w · DOI
  48. Tomasello R., 2014, Sci. Rep., 4, 1
  49. 10.1201/9781315284170 · DOI
  50. Kosterlitz J. M., 2018, Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two‐dimensional systems in Basic Notions Of Condensed Matter Physics, 493
  51. Rosales‐Guzmán C., 2017, SL30, 1, 57
  52. 10.1088/2040-8986/abcd02 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/s41377-019-0222-2 · DOI
  54. 10.1364/OE.18.010777 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/ncomms8706 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Zeng, X., Fang, J., Wu, H., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Zhou, Y., Yang, X., Wang, C., Wei, D., Chen, H., Gao, H., & Shen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Nonequilibrium Synthesis and Modulation of Condensed Matter Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Quantum Information and Quantum Optoelectronic Devices School of Physics Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an 710049 China
  • Center for Disruptive Photonic Technologies School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences & The Photonics Institute Nanyang Technological University Singapore 637378 Singapore
  • Department of Physics Huzhou University Huzhou 313000 China
Venue
Laser & Photonics Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-08
Volume
19
Issue
21
ISSN
  • 1863-8880
  • 1863-8899
Cited by
17
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (12404390, 12104358, 12104361, 12304406, 12175168, 92476105, 92050103)
  • Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023BSHEDZZ23)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (xzy012023042)
  • Ministry of Education - Singapore (RG157/23, RT11/23)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review