The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This 6‐month study evaluated the efficacy and safety of treatment with a nonablative radiofrequency (RF) device. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Eighty‐six subjects received a single treatment with the ThermaCool TC™ System (Thermage, Inc., Hayward, CA) and were evaluated for 6 months after treatment. Results: Independent scoring of blinded photographs resulted in Fitzpatrick wrinkle score improvements of at least 1 point in 83.2% (99/119) of treated periorbital areas. Treating physicians, without reference to pre‐treatment photographs, noted improvements in 28.9% (48/166) of treatment areas. Fifty percent (41/82) of subjects reported being satisfied or very satisfied with periorbital wrinkle reductions. Objective photographic analysis showed that 61.5% (40/65) of eyebrows were lifted by at least 0.5 mm. Rates and duration of edema/erythema were very low (e.g., vs. ablative procedures). Overall 2nd‐degree burn incidence was 0.36% (21 per 5,858 RF applications). Three patients had small areas of residual scarring at 6 months. Conclusions: A single treatment with this RF tissue tightening (RFTT) device produces objective and subjective reductions in periorbital wrinkles, measurable changes in brow position, and acceptable epidermal safety. These changes were indicative of a thermally induced early tissue‐tightening effect followed by additional tightening over a time course consistent with a thermal wound healing response. Lasers Surg. Med. 33:232–242, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI
Fitzpatrick, T. B. (1988) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008 · Cited by 4,339
Cited by
Manstein, D., Herron, G. S., Sink, R. K., Tanner, H., & Anderson, R. R. (2004) · Lasers in Surgery and Medicine · doi:10.1002/lsm.20048 · Cited by 1,605
Photoaging: mechanisms and repair
Rabe, J. H., Mamelak, A. J., McElgunn, P. J. S., Morison, W. L., & Sauder, D. N. (2006) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.05.010 · Cited by 610
Zelickson, B. D., Kist, D., Bernstein, E., Brown, D. B., Ksenzenko, S., Burns, J., Kilmer, S., Mehregan, D., & Pope, K. (2004) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.140.2.204 · Cited by 379
Self-citationCharacteristics and management of Asian skin
Chan, I. L., Cohen, S., da Cunha, M. G., & Maluf, L. C. (2019) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ijd.14153 · Cited by 108
Complications of Ablative and Nonablative Lasers and Light Sources
Tanzi, E. L., & Alster, T. S. (2008) · Complications in Cutaneous Surgery · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73152-0_13 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzpatrick, R., Geronemus, R., Goldberg, D., Kaminer, M., Kilmer, S., & Ruiz‐Esparza, J.
- Venue
- Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 232-242
- ISSN
- 0196-8092 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2047977845
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lsm.10225
- The paper
- Fitzpatrick, R., Geronemus, R., Goldberg, D., Kaminer, M., Kilmer, S., & Ruiz‐Esparza, J. (2003). Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.