Cited by 133Liver Disease and TransplantationCardiovascular and exercise physiologyNutrition and Health in Aging

Exercise capacity and muscle strength in patients with cirrhosis

Open access
Jones, Jacqueline C., Coombes, Jeff S., Macdonald, Graeme A.·2012·Liver Transplantation

Abstract

Exercise capacity and muscle strength are predictors of outcome in a number of clinical populations. Advanced liver disease is a catabolic state, and patients often have muscle wasting. However, the relationships between exercise capacity, strength, and outcomes for patients undergoing liver transplantation are poorly understood. Thirteen studies have examined the association between these parameters in patients with cirrhosis, and they have found a significant reduction in the exercise capacity and muscle strength of patients with cirrhosis versus healthy controls. These impairments appear to be independent of the etiology of cirrhosis, but the data are equivocal with respect to their association with disease severity. Two studies reported a significant and independent association between pretransplant exercise capacity and posttransplant survival. Another 2 studies found that exercise training was well tolerated in patients with cirrhosis and resulted in improvements in exercise capacity (both studies) and muscle mass (1 study). These data are provocative and suggest that measuring and improving the exercise capacity and muscle strength of patients with cirrhosis who are awaiting liver transplantation could potentially improve outcomes. Liver Transpl 18:146–151, 2012. © 2011 AASLD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lt.22472

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, J. C., Coombes, J. S., & Macdonald, G. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Macdonald, Graeme A.
Venue
Liver Transplantation
Published
2012-02
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
146-151
ISSN
1527-6465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072828164
Cited by
133
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Liver Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
liver cirrhosis, exercise capacity, muscle strength, exercise training, muscle atrophy, catabolic state, disease severity, outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Waiting Lists, Liver Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Exercise Tolerance, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Weakness, Recovery of Function, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review