The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Production and Characterization of Chitosan Fibers and 3‐D Fiber Mesh Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications
Open accessAbstract
Summary: This study reports on the production of chitosan fibers and 3‐D fiber meshes for the use as tissue engineering scaffolds. Both structures were produced by means of a wet spinning technique. Maximum strain at break and tensile strength of the developed fibers were found to be 8.5% and 204.9 MPa, respectively. After 14 d of immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and inductively coupled plasma emission (ICP) spectroscopy analyses showed that a bioactive Ca‐P layer was formed on the surface of the fibers, meaning that they exhibit a bioactive behavior. The samples showed around 120% max. swelling in physiological conditions. The pore sizes of 3‐D chitosan fiber mesh scaffolds were observed to be in the range of 100–500 μm by SEM. The equilibrium‐swelling ratio of the developed scaffolds was found to be around 170% (w/w) in NaCl solution at 37 °C. Besides that, the limit swelling strain was less than 30%, as obtained by mechanical spectroscopy measurements in the same conditions. The viscoelastic properties of the scaffolds were also evaluated by both creep and dynamic mechanical tests. By means of using short‐term MEM extraction test, both types of structures (fibers and scaffolds) were found to be non‐cytotoxic to fibroblasts. Furthermore, osteoblasts directly cultured over chitosan fiber mesh scaffolds presented good morphology and no inhibition of cell proliferation could be observed. Osteoblast‐like cells proliferating over chitosan based fibers after 7 d of culture. magnified imageOsteoblast‐like cells proliferating over chitosan based fibers after 7 d of culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chitin and chitosan polymers: Chemistry, solubility and fiber formation
Pillai, C. K. S., Paul, W., & Sharma, C. P. (2009) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.001 · Cited by 2,745
25th Anniversary Article: Rational Design and Applications of Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine
Annabi, N., Tamayol, A., Uquillas, J. A., Akbari, M., Bertassoni, L. E., Cha, C., Camci‐Unal, G., Dokmeci, M. R., Peppas, N. A., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201303233 · Cited by 1,409
Alves, N. M., & Mano, J. F. (2008) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.09.007 · Cited by 804
Self-citationBessa, P. C., Casal, M., & Reis, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.74 · Cited by 549
Self-citationFiber-based tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and opportunities
Tamayol, A., Akbari, M., Annabi, N., Paul, A., Khademhosseini, A., & Juncker, D. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.11.007 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Tuzlakoglu, K., Alves, C. M., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L.
- Venue
- Macromolecular Bioscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 811-819
- ISSN
- 1616-5187 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-5195
- OpenAlex
- W2110649772
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Production and Characterization of Chitosan Fibers and 3‐D Fiber Mesh Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mabi.200300100
- The paper
- Tuzlakoglu, K., Alves, C. M., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2004). Production and Characterization of Chitosan Fibers and 3‐D Fiber Mesh Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Macromolecular Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200300100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.