The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of Electroactive and Elastic Nanofibers that contain Polyaniline and Poly(L‐lactide‐co‐ε‐caprolactone) for the Control of Cell Adhesion
Abstract
In this work, electrically conductive polyaniline (PAni) doped with camphorsulfonic acid (CPSA) is blended with poly(L‐lactide‐co‐ε‐caprolactone) (PLCL), and then electrospun to prepare uniform nanofibers. The CPSA‐PAni/PLCL nanofibers show a smooth fiber structure without coarse lumps or beads and consistent fiber diameters (which range from 100 to 700 nm) even with an increase in the amount of CPSA‐PAni (from 0 to 30 wt.‐%). However, the elongation at break decreases from 391.54 ± 9.20% to 207.85 ± 6.74% when 30% of CPSA‐PAni is incorporated. Analysis of the surface of the nanofibers demonstrates the presence of homogeneously blended CPSA‐PAni. Most importantly, a four‐point probe analysis reveals that electrical properties are maintained in the nanofibers where the conductivity is significantly increased from 0.0015 to 0.0138 S · cm−1 when the nanofibers are prepared with 30% CPSA‐PAni. The cell adhesion tests using human dermal fibroblasts, NIH‐3T3 fibroblasts, and C2C12 myoblasts demonstrate significantly higher adhesion on the CPSA‐PAni/PLCL nanofibers than pure PLCL nanofibers. In addition, the growth of NIH‐3T3 fibroblasts is enhanced under the stimulation of various direct current flows. The CPSA‐PAni/PLCL nanofibers with electrically conductive properties may potentially be used as a platform substrate to study the effect of electrical signals on cell activities and to direct desirable cell function for tissue engineering applications. magnified image
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness
Engler, A. J., Griffin, M. A., Sen, S., Bönnemann, C. G., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2004) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200405004 · Cited by 1,743
Jeong, S. I., Kim, B.-S., Lee, Y. M., Ihn, K. J., Kim, S. H., & Kim, Y. H. (2004) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049921i · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Cited by
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., Baharvand, H., Kiani, S., Al-Deyab, S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.383 · Cited by 698
Synthetic biodegradable functional polymers for tissue engineering: a brief review
Guo, B., & Ma, P. X. (2014) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-014-5086-y · Cited by 592
Biodegradable Polymeric Materials in Degradable Electronic Devices
Feig, V. R., Tran, H., & Bao, Z. (2018) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00595 · Cited by 448
Táborská, J., Blanquer, A., Brynda, E., Filová, E., Stiborová, L., Jenčová, V., Havlíčková, K., Riedelová, Z., & Riedel, T. (2023) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s393890 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeong, S. I., Jun, I. D., Choi, M. J., Nho, Y. C., Lee, Y. M., & Shin, H.
- Venue
- Macromolecular Bioscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 627-637
- ISSN
- 1616-5187 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-5195
- OpenAlex
- W2044358799
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of Electroactive and Elastic Nanofibers that contain Polyaniline and Poly(L‐lactide‐co‐ε‐caprolactone) for the Control of Cell Adhesion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mabi.200800005
- The paper
- Jeong, S. I., Jun, I. D., Choi, M. J., Nho, Y. C., Lee, Y. M., & Shin, H. (2008). Development of Electroactive and Elastic Nanofibers that contain Polyaniline and Poly(L‐lactide‐co‐ε‐caprolactone) for the Control of Cell Adhesion. Macromolecular Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200800005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.