The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repurchase loyalty: The role of involvement and satisfaction
Open accessAbstract
Most studies of satisfaction and loyalty focus on the brand level of decision making. Involvement, on the other hand, is mainly defined and measured on the product category level. This study explores this gap by investigating the role of product category involvement and satisfaction in the formation of repurchase loyalty toward a product category. The study proposes alternative models that suggest that involvement may be an antecedent, a motivational mediator as well as a moderator, between satisfaction and repurchase loyalty. Secondly, it discusses the relative importance of satisfaction in forming involvement and loyalty by introducing social norms and perceived control (opportunity) as alternative antecedents. Involvement proved to be a complete mediator between satisfaction and repurchase loyalty, and a partial mediator between social norm/perceived control and loyalty. Involvement as a moderator was not supported. Social norms showed nearly the same ability as individual satisfaction in explaining variance in product category involvement. However, perceived control had a significant direct influence on repurchase loyalty, but the relationship between perceived control and involvement was not significant. Implications of these findings for satisfaction–loyalty development and research are explored. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,690
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,141
Assessing construct validity in organizational research
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393203 · Cited by 6,621
Cited by
Kim, J.-H. (2018) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287517721369 · Cited by 679
De Vries, N. J., & Carlson, J. (2014) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/bm.2014.18 · Cited by 418
Mobile Ad Effectiveness: Hyper-Contextual Targeting with Crowdedness
Andrews, M., Luo, X., Fang, Z., & Ghose, A. (2016) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2015.0905 · Cited by 355
Investigating mediators between corporate reputation and customer citizenship behaviors
Bartikowski, B., & Walsh, G. (2011) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.09.018 · Cited by 285
Leonidou, L. C., Kvasova, O., Leonidou, C. N., & Chari, S. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1267-9 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, S. O.
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 315-341
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W2023836995
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 28.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repurchase loyalty: The role of involvement and satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mar.20163
- The paper
- Olsen, S. O. (2007). Repurchase loyalty: The role of involvement and satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.