The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brand Authenticity: Testing the Antecedents and Outcomes of Brand Management's Passion for its Products
Abstract
While customer orientation is accepted as a core marketing principle, this research suggests that an opposing orientation—product orientation—may offer an advantage. Managers who follow a product orientation focus on products that interest and inspire them rather than on products that fulfill consumers’ desires. This research suggests that a consumer's perception that managers follow a product orientation is consistent with prior conceptualizations of brand authenticity. That research suggests that brands perceived as authentic are evaluated more positively, yet that research does not empirically assess brand authenticity's effects nor suggest its antecedents. To fill this gap, the authors develop a conceptualization and model of brand authenticity grounded in self‐determination theory, attribution theory, and extant authentic human brand research. Brand authenticity is defined as the extent to which consumers perceive that a brand's managers are intrinsically motivated in that they are passionate about and devoted to providing their products. The model proposes four antecedents of brand authenticity—two related to rare brand behaviors (uniqueness and scarcity), and two related to stable brand behaviors (longevity and longitudinal consistency). It also proposes two perceptual outcomes of brand authenticity—expected quality and trust. Two 2 × 2 experiments (n= 136 for Study 1;n= 155 for Study 2) demonstrate a positive impact of the antecedents on brand authenticity and of brand authenticity on the outcomes. Brand authenticity mediates these effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298805200302 · Cited by 18,292
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · cited 3×
“Attribution theory posits that observations of another’s stable behavior should lead to perceptions that such behavior is attributed to that person rather than to external forces (Kelley, 1973).”
BackgroundFrom acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424
Les passions de l'ame: on obsessive and harmonious passion
Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., Gagné, M., & Marsolais, J. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756 · Cited by 2,566
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761 · Cited by 2,182
Cited by
Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation
Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008 · Cited by 1,452
When less is more: the impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure
Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2020.1718740 · Cited by 508
What makes followers loyal? The role of influencer interactivity in building influencer brand equity
Jun, S., & Yi, J. (2020) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-02-2019-2280 · Cited by 340
The authentic virtual influencer: Authenticity manifestations in the metaverse
Koles, B., Audrezet, A., Moulard, J. G., Ameen, N., & McKenna, B. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114325 · Cited by 254
Self-citationArtificial empathy in healthcare chatbots: Does it feel authentic?
Seitz, L. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100067 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Moulard, J. G., Raggio, R. D., & Folse, J. A. G.
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 421-436
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W2353334026
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 21.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brand Authenticity: Testing the Antecedents and Outcomes of Brand Management's Passion for its Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mar.20888
- The paper
- Moulard, J. G., Raggio, R. D., & Folse, J. A. G. (2016). Brand Authenticity: Testing the Antecedents and Outcomes of Brand Management's Passion for its Products. Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.