How and when taking pictures undermines the enjoyment of experiences
Abstract
The consumption of experiences (as opposed to products) has seen an increasing amount of research attention in recent years. A key aspect of the experiential consumption journey is how the experience is consumed. For instance, people almost invariably take pictures during highly enjoyable experiences such as vacations or important family events. Although past research has suggested that taking pictures may enhance the enjoyment of moderately enjoyable experiences, the effect of picture taking on the real‐time enjoyment of highly enjoyable experiences is not clear. To address this matter, the authors investigate whether taking pictures affects consumers’ enjoyment of highly enjoyable hedonic experiences. A series of laboratory studies demonstrate that taking pictures (compared with not taking pictures) can decrease enjoyment of highly enjoyable experiences. This study suggests that, by constantly striving to document their experiences, consumers may unwittingly fail to enjoy those experiences to the fullest. These results have implications for how firms may best stage experiential offerings to enhance their customers’ experiences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Taking photos can increase the enjoyment of an event but less likely so when the photo-taking creates interference or the event is already highly enjoyable.
“Regarding the latter, it has been demonstrated that taking photos can increase the enjoyment of an event but less likely so when the photo-taking creates interference or the event is already highly enjoyable (Diehl et al., 2016;Nardini et al, 2019).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Nardini et al, 2019
Cites
Happiness from Ordinary and Extraordinary Experiences
Bhattacharjee, A., & Mogilner, C. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/674724 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
How taking photos increases enjoyment of experiences
Diehl, K., Zauberman, G., & Barasch, A. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000055 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nardini, G., Lutz, R. J., & LeBoeuf, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nardini, Gia
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-10
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 520-529
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W2910573435
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology and Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Keywords
- experiential consumption, hedonic experience, consumer behavior, experiential marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review