The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitudes and recycling: Does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction?
Abstract
Recent attempts to improve the influence of social marketing have often focused on behavioral strategies, largely neglecting the concept of attitude. This is understandable given the weak performance of attitudinal variables as a predictor in past studies of proenvironmental behavior. However, we suggest that part of the reason for the poor association between attitudes and such behavior is the possibility that many altruistic acts such as recycling are subject to affective influences that may not be fully captured by commonly employed attitude measures. We also suggest that attitude strength might moderate the extent to which affective reactions account for additional variance in behavior. Specifically, it is predicted that affect is more important for weak than for strong attitudes. Empirical results are presented to support these suggestions. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298204600314 · Cited by 5,616
Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis
Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482 · Cited by 3,390
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Status-quo and omission biases
Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00208786 · Cited by 613
Cited by
The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Gifford, R. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023566 · Cited by 2,326
Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior
Chan, R. Y. K. (2001) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.1013 · Cited by 1,220
van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018 · Cited by 541
Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza Ibáñez, V. (2006) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/02634500610711842 · Cited by 267
Effects of green brand on green purchase intention
Huang, Y.-C., Yang, M., & Wang, Y.-C. (2014) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/mip-10-2012-0105 · Cited by 238
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, S. M., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E.
- Venue
- Psychology & Marketing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-374
- ISSN
- 0742-6046 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6793
- OpenAlex
- W2105427264
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudes and recycling: Does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mar.4220110405
- The paper
- Smith, S. M., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Attitudes and recycling: Does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction? Psychology & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220110405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.