Cited by 60Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

Visible light—responsive drug delivery nanoparticle via donor–acceptor stenhouse adducts (DASA)

Open access
Yap, Jeaniffer E., Zhang, Lin, Lovegrove, Jordan T., Beves, Jonathon E., Stenzel, Martina H.·2020·Macromolecular Rapid Communications

Abstract

Stimuli-responsive drug release from a nanocarrier triggered by light enables the control of the amount of drug locally. Here, block copolymer micelles based on poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMEMA) as the hydrophilic block and a polymer with pendant donor-acceptor Stenhouse adducts (DASA) are used as a means to trigger the release of drugs under green light. The micelles are loaded with ellipticine to yield light-responsive nanoparticles with sizes of around 35 nm according to transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. Two micelles with a drug loading content of 4.75 and 7.4 wt% are prepared, but the micelle with the higher drug loading content leads to substantial protein adsorption. The release of ellipticine from the micelle, which is monitored using the polarity-sensitive fluorescence of ellipticine, can be switched on by light and off by thermal recovery of DASA in the dark. The micelles are readily taken up by Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 breast cancer cells. Subsequent light irradiation leads to enhanced drug release inside the cell as seen by the enhanced fluorescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/marc.202000236

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This approach, combined with adequate mathematical models, can be used to predict the actual release kinetic from micelles.

    “This approach, combined with adequate mathematical models, can be used to predict the actual release kinetic from micelles [117,122].”

    From Polymeric micelles in drug delivery: An insight of the techniques for their characterization and assessment in biorelevant conditions (2021) · cites this paper as [122]

    In the drug-release discussion (page not available), the paper describes using changes in ellipticine’s absorbance to monitor release from micelles and says the curves need deconvolution for quantitative analysis. It does not describe combining this approach with mathematical models to predict release kinetics. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. L. Beaute, N. McClenaghan, S. Lecommandoux, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2019, 138, 148.
  2. P. Xiao, J. Zhang, J. Zhao, M. H. Stenzel, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 74, 1.
  3. A. Sanchis, J.-P. Salvador, M.-P. Marco, Colloids Surf., B 2019, 173, 825.
  4. L. Li, W. W. Yang, D. G. Xu, J. Drug Targeting 2019, 27, 423.
  5. M. M. Lino, L. Ferreira, Drug Discovery Today 2018, 23, 1062.
  6. S. Jia, W.-K. Fong, B. Graham, B. J. Boyd, Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 2873.
  7. J. Boelke, S. Hecht, Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900404.
  8. M. J. Davies, R. J. Truscott, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 2001, 63, 114.
  9. S. Helmy, S. Oh, F. A. Leibfarth, C. J. Hawker, J. Read de Alaniz, J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 11316.
  10. S. Helmy, F. A. Leibfarth, S. Oh, J. E. Poelma, C. J. Hawker, J. Read de Alaniz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 8169.
  11. M. Di Donato, M. M. Lerch, A. Lapini, A. D. Laurent, A. Iagatti, L. Bussotti, S. P. Ihrig, M. Medved, D. Jacquemin, W. Szymanski, W. J. Buma, P. Foggi, B. L. Feringa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 15596.
  12. N. Mallo, E. D. Foley, H. Iranmanesh, A. D. W. Kennedy, E. T. Luis, J. Ho, J. B. Harper, J. E. Beves, Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 8242.
  13. M. M. Lerch, M. Medved, A. Lapini, A. D. Laurent, A. Iagatti, L. Bussotti, W. Szymański, W. J. Buma, P. Foggi, M. Di Donato, B. L. Feringa, J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 955.
  14. M. M. Lerch, S. J. Wezenberg, W. Szymanski, B. L. Feringa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6344.
  15. N. Mallo, P. T. Brown, H. Iranmanesh, T. S. MacDonald, M. J. Teusner, J. B. Harper, G. E. Ball, J. E. Beves, Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 13576.
  16. M. M. Lerch, W. Szymanski, B. L. Feringa, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 1910.
  17. J. R. Hemmer, S. O. Poelma, N. Treat, Z. A. Page, N. D. Dolinski, Y. J. Diaz, W. Tomlinson, K. D. Clark, J. P. Hooper, C. Hawker, J. R. de Alaniz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 13960.
  18. T. Senthilkumar, L. Zhou, Q. Gu, L. Liu, F. Lv, S. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13114.
  19. V. Marturano, H. Marcille, P. Cerruti, N. A. G. Bandeira, M. Giamberini, A. Trojanowska, B. Tylkowski, C. Carfagna, G. Ausanio, V. Ambrogi, ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 4499.
  20. S. O. Poelma, S. S. Oh, S. Helmy, A. S. Knight, G. L. Burnett, H. T. Soh, C. J. Hawker, J. Read de Alaniz, Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 10525.
  21. H. Zhao, D. Wang, Y. Fan, M. Ren, S. Dong, Y. Zheng, Langmuir 2018, 34, 15537.
  22. M. Nau, D. Seelinger, M. Biesalski, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900378.
  23. G. Sinawang, B. Wu, J. Wang, S. Li, Y. He, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016, 217, 2409.
  24. S. Singh, K. Friedel, M. Himmerlich, Y. Lei, G. Schlingloff, A. Schober, ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4, 1273.
  25. S. Ulrich, J. R. Hemmer, Z. A. Page, N. D. Dolinski, O. Rifaie- Graham, N. Bruns, C. J. Hawker, L. F. Boesel, J. Read de Alaniz, ACS Macro Lett. 2017, 6, 738.
  26. S. Helmy, J. Read de Alaniz, in Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry (Eds: E. F. V. Scriven, C. A. Ramsden), Academic Press 2015, pp. 131-177.
  27. F.-Y. Tang, J.-N. Hou, K.-X. Liang, Y. Liu, L. Deng, Y.-N. Liu, New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 6071.
  28. S. Yang, J. Liu, Z. Cao, M. Li, Q. Luo, D. Qu, Dyes Pigm. 2018, 148, 341.
  29. M. M. Lerch, M. J. Hansen, W. A. Velema, W. Szymanski, B. L. Feringa, Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12054.
  30. D. Zhong, Z. Cao, B. Wu, Q. Zhang, G. Wang, Sens. Actuators, B 2018, 254, 385.
  31. A. Balamurugan, H. Lee, Macromolecules 2016, 49, 2568.
  32. Y. J. Diaz, Z. A. Page, A. S. Knight, N. J. Treat, J. R. Hemmer, C. J. Hawker, J. Read de Alaniz, Chemistry (Easton) 2017, 23, 3562.
  33. B. P. Mason, M. Whittaker, J. Hemmer, S. Arora, A. Harper, S. Alnemrat, A. McEachen, S. Helmy, J. Read de Alaniz, J. P. Hooper, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 041906.
  34. Q. Chen, Y. J. Diaz, M. C. Hawker, M. R. Martinez, Z. A. Page, S. Xiao-An Zhang, C. J. Hawker, J. Read De Alaniz, Macromolecules 2019, 52, 4370.
  35. O. Rifaie-Graham, S. Ulrich, N. F. B. Galensowske, S. Balog, M. Chami, D. Rentsch, J. R. Hemmer, J. Read de Alaniz, L. F. Boesel, N. Bruns, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 8027.
  36. B. Wu, T. Xue, W. Wang, S. Li, J. Shen, Y. He, J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 8538.
  37. S. Jia, A. Tan, A. Hawley, B. Graham, B. J. Boyd, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 548, 151.
  38. M. Stiborová, J. Poljaková, E. Martínková, L. Bořek-Dohalská, T. Eckschlager, R. Kizek, E. Frei, Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2011, 4, 98.
  39. J. E. Yap, N. Mallo, D. S. Thomas, J. E. Beves, M. H. Stenzel, Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 6515.
  40. M. M. Lerch, M. Di Donato, A. D. Laurent, M. Medved, A. Iagatti, L. Bussotti, A. Lapini, W. J. Buma, P. Foggi, W. Szymanski, B. L. Feringa, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 8063.
  41. J. Liu, Y. Xiao, C. Allen, J. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 93, 132.
  42. F. Alexis, E. Pridgen, L. K. Molnar, O. C. Farokhzad, Mol. Pharma- ceutics 2008, 5, 505.
  43. P. P. Karmali, D. Simberg, Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2011, 8, 343.
  44. Q. Dai, C. Walkey, W. C. W. Chan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5093.
  45. A. Piloni, C. K. Wong, F. Chen, M. Lord, A. Walther, M. H. Stenzel, Nanoscale 2019, 11, 23259.
  46. P. del Pino, B. Pelaz, Q. Zhang, P. Maffre, G. U. Nienhaus, W. J. Parak, Mater. Horiz. 2014, 1, 301.
  47. C. Cao, J. Zhao, M. Lu, C. J. Garvey, M. H. Stenzel, Biomacromol- ecules 2019, 20, 1545.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yap, J. E., Zhang, L., Lovegrove, J. T., Beves, J. E., & Stenzel, M. H.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Stenzel, Martina H.
Venue
Macromolecular Rapid Communications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-09
Volume
41
Issue
21
Pages
e2000236-e2000236
ISSN
  • 1022-1336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3927
OpenAlex
W3047728651
Cited by
60
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Macromolecular Rapid Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP160101172)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Keywords
DASA, block copolymer micelles, ellipticine, stimuli-responsive drug release, protein adsorption, breast cancer cells, intracellular drug release, fluorescence imaging
MeSH terms
Drug Carriers, Light, Micelles, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymers, Nanoparticles, Drug Liberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review