The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry
Abstract
Matrix‐dependent signal suppression or enhancement represents a major drawback in quantitative analysis with liquid chromatography coupled to atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry (LC–API‐MS). Because matrix effects (ME) might exert a detrimental impact on important method parameters (limit of detection, limit of quantification, linearity, accuracy, and precision), they have to be tested and evaluated during validation procedure. This review gives a detailed description on when these phenomena might be expected, and how they can be evaluated. The major sources of ME are discussed and illustrated with examples from bioanalytical, pharmaceutical, environmental, and food analysis. Because there is no universal solution for ME, the main strategies to overcome these phenomena are described in detail. Special emphasis is devoted to the sample‐preparation procedures as well as to the recent improvements on chromatographic and mass spectrometric conditions. An overview of the main calibration techniques to compensate for ME is also presented. All these solutions can be used alone or in combination to retrieve the performance of the LC–MS for a particular matrix–analyte combination. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 30:491–509, 2011
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sullivan, M. R., Danai, L. V., Lewis, C. A., Chan, S. H., Gui, D. Y., Kunchok, T., Dennstedt, E. A., Vander Heiden, M. G., & Muir, A. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.44235 · Cited by 588
Barri, T., Holmer-Jensen, J., Hermansen, K., & Dragsted, L. O. (2012) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.12.065 · Cited by 57
Ciofi, L., Renai, L., Rossini, D., Ancillotti, C., Falai, A., Fibbi, D., Bruzzoniti, M. C., Santana-Rodriguez, J. J., Orlandini, S., & Del Bubba, M. (2018) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2017.08.052 · Cited by 47
Case for the wider adoption of mass spectrometry-based adrenal steroid testing, and beyond
Monaghan, P. J., Keevil, B. G., Stewart, P. M., & Trainer, P. J. (2014) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2258 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Trufelli, H., Palma, P., Famiglini, G., & Cappiello, A.
- Venue
- Mass Spectrometry Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-22
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 491-509
- ISSN
- 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2787
- OpenAlex
- W1991430603
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mas.20298
- The paper
- Trufelli, H., Palma, P., Famiglini, G., & Cappiello, A. (2011). An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.