The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymorphic variation inhOGG1 and risk of cancer: A review of the functional and epidemiologic literature
Abstract
The gene encoding human 8-oxoguanine glycosylase 1 (hOGG1) is involved in DNA base excision repair. The encoded DNA glycosylase excises 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-OHdG), a highly mutagenic base produced in DNA as a result of exposure to reactive oxygen species (ROS). Polymorphisms in this gene may alter glycosylase function and an individual's ability to repair damaged DNA, possibly resulting in genetic instability that can foster carcinogenesis. In order to elucidate the possible impact of polymorphisms in hOGG1, we performed a literature review of both functional and epidemiologic studies that assessed the effects of these polymorphisms on repair function, levels of oxidative DNA damage, or associations with cancer risk. Fourteen functional studies and 19 epidemiologic studies of breast, colon, esophageal, head and neck, lung, nasopharyngeal, orolaryngeal, prostate, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), and stomach cancers were identified. Although the larger functional studies suggest reduced repair function with variant alleles in hOGG1, the evidence is generally inconclusive. There is some epidemiologic evidence that risk for esophageal, lung, nasopharyngeal, orolaryngeal, and prostate is related to hOGG1 genotype, whereas risk of breast cancer does not appear related. In studies that explored potential interactions with environmental factors, cancer risk for hOGG1 genotypes differed depending on exposure, especially for colon cancer. In summary, there is limited evidence that polymorphisms in hOGG1 affect repair function and carcinogenesis. Larger, well-designed functional and epidemiologic studies are needed to clarify these relationships, especially with respect to interactions with other DNA repair enzymes and interactions with environmental factors that increase carcinogenic load.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
p53 Mutations in Human Cancers
Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., & Harris, C. C. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1905840 · Cited by 8,018
Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer
Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35077232 · Cited by 3,939
Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG
Shibutani, S., Takeshita, M., & Grollman, A. P. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349431a0 · Cited by 2,224
8-Hydroxyguanine, an abundant form of oxidative DNA damage, causes G-T and A-C substitutions.
Cheng, K. C., Cahill, D. S., Kasai, H., Nishimura, S., & Loeb, L. A. (1992) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)48474-8 · Cited by 1,844
Wacholder, S., Chanock, S., Garcia-Closas, M., El ghormli, L., & Rothman, N. (2004) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh075 · Cited by 1,754
Lindahl, T., & Wood, R. D. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5446.1897 · Cited by 1,494
Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk.
Goode, E. L., Ulrich, C. M., & Potter, J. D. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 1,201
Self-citationCaldecott, K. W., Aoufouchi, S., Johnson, P., & Shall, S. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.22.4387 · Cited by 620
RESPONSE Re: Markers of DNA Repair and Susceptibility to Cancer in Humans: an Epidemiologic Review
Berwick, M. (2000) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.18.1537 · Cited by 545
Two Pathways for Base Excision Repair in Mammalian Cells
Frosina, G., Fortini, P., Rossi, O., Carrozzino, F., Raspaglio, G., Cox, L. S., Lane, D. P., Abbondandolo, A., & Dogliotti, E. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.16.9573 · Cited by 534
Cited by
Oxidative Stress in Aging Human Skin
Rinnerthaler, M., Bischof, J., Streubel, M., Trost, A., & Richter, K. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5020545 · Cited by 1,053
Base excision repair and cancer
Wallace, S. S., Murphy, D. L., & Sweasy, J. B. (2012) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.038 · Cited by 329
Chromosomal aberrations and SCEs as biomarkers of cancer risk
Norppa, H., Bonassi, S., Hansteen, I.-L., Hagmar, L., Strömberg, U., Rössner, P., Boffetta, P., Lindholm, C., Gundy, S., Lazutka, J., et al. (2006) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.05.030 · Cited by 293
DNA Damage and Repair in Alzheimers Disease
Coppede, F., & Migliore, L. (2009) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/156720509787313970 · Cited by 148
DNA-repair in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease
Bucholtz, N., & Demuth, I. (2013) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.07.005 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiss, J. M., Goode, E. L., Ladiges, W. C., & Ulrich, C. M.
- Venue
- Molecular Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 127-141
- ISSN
- 0899-1987 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2744
- OpenAlex
- W2033256459
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymorphic variation inhOGG1 and risk of cancer: A review of the functional and epidemiologic literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mc.20067
- The paper
- Weiss, J. M., Goode, E. L., Ladiges, W. C., & Ulrich, C. M. (2005). Polymorphic variation inhOGG1 and risk of cancer: A review of the functional and epidemiologic literature. Molecular Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.20067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.