Cited by 148Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDNA Repair MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

DNA Damage and Repair in Alzheimers Disease

Coppede, Fabio, Migliore, Lucia·2009·Current Alzheimer Research

Abstract

The vast majority of the studies performed so far and aimed at elucidating DNA repair mechanisms has been performed in mitotic cells, such as transformed or cancer cell lines. Therefore, our understanding of DNA repair mechanisms in post-mitotic cells, such as neurons, remains one of the most exciting areas for future investigations. Markers of DNA damage, particularly oxidative DNA damage, have been largely found in brain regions, peripheral tissues, and biological fluids of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. Moreover, recent studies from our and other groups in individuals affected by Mild Cognitive Impairment provided evidence that oxidative DNA damage is one of the earliest detectable events within the progression from a normal brain to dementia. Almost one decade ago a decrease in the DNA base excision repair (BER) activity was observed in post mortem brain regions of AD individuals, leading to the hypothesis that the brain in AD might be subjected to the double insult of increased DNA damage, as well as deficiencies of DNA repair pathways. Subsequent studies have provided accumulating evidence of impaired DNA repair in AD. Moreover, functional variants and polymorphisms of DNA repair genes have been the focus of several cancer association studies, but only in recent years some of them have been investigated as possible AD risk factors. The few studies performed so far suggest that some variants might play a role in AD pathogenesis and deserve further investigations. Her…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/156720509787313970

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxidative DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction are thought to contribute to neurodegeneration of AD, vascular dementia, HD, PD and epilepsy.

    “Oxidative DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction are thought to contribute to the neurodegeneration of AD [75,76], vascular dementia [77], HD [78], PD [79] and epilepsy [80].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coppede, F., & Migliore, L.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Migliore, Lucia
Venue
Current Alzheimer Research
Published
2009-02-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
36-47
ISSN
1567-2050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1558580604
Cited by
148
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Alzheimer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, DNA damage, DNA repair, oxidative DNA damage, base excision repair, neurons, postmitotic cells, mild cognitive impairment, DNA repair gene polymorphisms, genetic risk factors, AD pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cell Nucleus, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Nerve Degeneration, Cell Death, Oxidative Stress, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review