Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 525

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors impacting on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: Results from an international survey

The Global Parkinson's Disease Survey (GPDS) Steering Committee·2002·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Current management guidelines for the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are limited due to the lack of knowledge of factors that influence health‐related quality of life (HRQL). To assess the HRQL of people with PD, and to systematically identify and evaluate those factors (other than disease severity and medication, which could have an impact), we undertook a cross‐sectional, randomized selection, multicenter international survey of patients with PD, caregivers, and clinicians. Face‐to‐face interviews were conducted with subjects in six countries. Disease severity, medication, and other factors hypothesized to influence HRQL were assessed using a combination of specially developed questionnaires and validated instruments including the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire‐39 (HRQL), Hoehn and Yahr Stage (disease severity), and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI; depression). Multiple linear regression models were used to demonstrate whether the factors investigated contribute significantly to HRQL. The results obtained indicated that Hoehn and Yahr stage and medication explained only 17.3% of the variability in HRQL of patients with PD, although both were significant (R 2 = 0.173, P < 0.05). Other factors increased the explanatory power to adjusted R 2 = 0.597, with BDI being the most significant predictor of variability in HRQL (adjusted R 2 = 0.582; P < 0.001), followed by “Satisfaction with the explanation of the condition at diagnosis” and “Current feelings of optimism” (both P < 0.05). These factors, in addition to disease severity and medication, explain 59.7% of the variability in HRQL across the population. In conclusion, depression (as measured by the BDI) in PD, “satisfaction with the explanation of the condition at diagnosis” and “current feelings of optimism” have a significant impact on HRQL. The completion of this initial analysis is the first step towards developing management guidelines that truly influence the HRQL of patients with PD. © 2001 Movement Disorder Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.10010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 525

Metadata

Authors
The Global Parkinson's Disease Survey (GPDS) Steering Committee
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
60-67
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2975629214
Cited by
525
References
4
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors impacting on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: Results from an international survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.10010
The paper
The Global Parkinson's Disease Survey (GPDS) Steering Committee. (2002). Factors impacting on quality of life in Parkinson's disease: Results from an international survey. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.10010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.