Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging in confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy

Open access
Massey, Luke A., Micallef, Caroline, Paviour, Dominic C., O'Sullivan, Sean S., Ling, Helen, Williams, David R., Kallis, Constantinos, Holton, Janice L., Revesz, Tamas, Burn, David J., Yousry, Tarek, Lees, Andrew J., Fox, Nick C., Jäger, Hans R.·2012·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is often used to aid the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and multiple system atrophy (MSA), but its ability to predict the histopathological diagnosis has not been systematically studied. cMRI from 48 neuropathologically confirmed cases, including PSP (n = 22), MSA (n = 13), Parkinson's disease (PD) (n = 7), and corticobasal degeneration (n = 6), and controls (n = 9) were assessed blinded to clinical details and systematically rated for reported abnormalities. Clinical diagnosis and macroscopic postmortem findings were retrospectively assessed. Radiological assessment of MRI was correct in 16 of 22 (72.7%) PSP cases and 10 of 13 (76.9%) MSA cases with substantial interrater agreement (Cohen's kappa 0.708; P < .001); no PSP case was misclassified as MSA or vice versa. MRI was less sensitive but more specific than clinical diagnosis in PSP and both more sensitive and specific than clinical diagnosis in MSA. The “hummingbird” and “morning glory” signs were highly specific for PSP, and “the middle cerebellar peduncle sign” and “hot cross bun” for MSA, but sensitivity was lower (up to 68.4%) and characteristic findings may not be present even at autopsy. cMRI, clinical diagnosis, and macroscopic examination at postmortem have similar sensitivity and specificity in predicting a neuropathological diagnosis. We have validated specific radiological signs in pathologically confirmed PSP and MSA. However, the low sensitivity of these and macroscopic findings at autopsy suggest a need for imaging techniques sensitive to microstructural abnormalities without regional atrophy. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.24968

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Massey, L. A., Micallef, C., Paviour, D. C., O'Sullivan, S. S., Ling, H., Williams, D. R., Kallis, C., Holton, J. L., Revesz, T., Burn, D. J., Yousry, T., Lees, A. J., Fox, N. C., & Jäger, H. R.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
27
Issue
14
Pages
1754-1762
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2107130702
Cited by
211
References
3
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conventional magnetic resonance imaging in confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.24968
The paper
Massey, L. A., Micallef, C., Paviour, D. C., O'Sullivan, S. S., Ling, H., Williams, D. R., Kallis, C., Holton, J. L., Revesz, T., Burn, D. J., Yousry, T., Lees, A. J., Fox, N. C., & Jäger, H. R. (2012). Conventional magnetic resonance imaging in confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.24968

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.