The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging concepts in the physiological basis of dystonia
Open accessAbstract
Work over the past 2 decades has led to substantial changes in our understanding of dystonia pathophysiology. Three general abnormalities appear to underlie the pathophysiological substrate. The first is a loss of inhibition. This makes sense considering that it may be responsible for the excess of movement and for the overflow phenomena seen in dystonia. A second abnormality is sensory dysfunction which is related to the mild sensory complaints in patients with focal dystonias and may be responsible for some of the motor dysfunction. Third, evidence from animal models of dystonia as well as from patients with primary dystonia has revealed significant alterations of synaptic plasticity characterized by a disruption of homeostatic plasticity, with a prevailing facilitation of synaptic potentiation, together with the loss of synaptic inhibitory processes. We speculate that during motor learning this abnormal plasticity may lead to an abnormal sensorimotor integration, leading to consolidation of abnormal motor engrams. If so, then removing this abnormal plasticity might have little immediate effect on dystonic movements because bad motor memories have already been ‘‘learned'' and are difficult to erase. These considerations might explain the delayed clinical effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with generalized dystonia. Current lines of research will be discussed from a network perspective. © 2013 Movement Disorder Society
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
Bienenstock, E., Cooper, L., & Munro, P. (1982) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.02-01-00032.1982 · Cited by 2,896
Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons
Turrigiano, G. G., Leslie, K. R., Desai, N. S., Rutherford, L. C., & Nelson, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36103 · Cited by 2,226
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain
Hallett, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35018000 · Cited by 1,603 · cited 1×
“Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows the study of different inhibitory circuits at the cortical level.(6) Many of these are impaired in dystonia and the abnormal intracortical inhibition may be found in both hemispheres despite unilateral symptoms and even in asymptomatic body parts.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Dystonia as a network disorder: What is the role of the cerebellum?
Prudente, C. N., Hess, E. J., & Jinnah, H. A. (2014) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.062 · Cited by 262
The Cortico-Basal Ganglia-Cerebellar Network: Past, Present and Future Perspectives
Milardi, D., Quartarone, A., Bramanti, A., Anastasi, G., Bertino, S., Basile, G. A., Buonasera, P., Pilone, G., Celeste, G., Rizzo, G., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2019.00061 · Cited by 162
Self-citationTHE INFLUENCE OF OCCLUSAL STABILIZATION APPLIANCES ON CERVICAL DYSTONIA SYMPTOMS
Navrotchi, C., & Badea, M. E. (2017) · Medicine and Pharmacy Reports · doi:10.15386/cjmed-824 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Quartarone, A., & Hallett, M.
- Venue
- Movement Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-15
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 958-967
- ISSN
- 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8257
- OpenAlex
- W1891730382
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging concepts in the physiological basis of dystonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mds.25532
- The paper
- Quartarone, A., & Hallett, M. (2013). Emerging concepts in the physiological basis of dystonia. Movement Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.