The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intestinal absorption of dietary carotenoids
Abstract
The assessment of carotenoid bioavailability has long been hampered by the limited knowledge of their absorption mechanisms. However, recent reports have elucidated important aspects of carotenoid digestion and absorption. Disruption of food matrix and increasing amounts of fat seem to enhance the absorption of carotenes to a larger extent than that of xanthophylls. Comparing different carotenoid species, xanthophylls seem to be more easily released from the food matrix and more efficiently micellized than the carotenes. On the other hand, carotenes are more efficiently taken up by the enterocytes. However, carotenoid emulsification and micellization steps are largely affected by the food matrix and dietary components, being the main determinant of carotenoid bioavailability from foodstuffs. Although the intestinal uptake of carotenoids has been thought to occur by simple diffusion, recent studies reported the existence of receptor‐mediated transport of carotenoids in enterocytes. Comparisons between the intestinal absorption of a wide array of carotenoids would be useful to elucidate the absorption mechanism of each carotenoid species, in view of the recent indications that intestinal carotenoid uptake may involve the scavenger receptor class B type I and possibly other epithelial transporters. The unraveling of the whole mechanism underlying the absorption of carotenoids will be the challenge for future studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brown, M. J., Ferruzzi, M. G., Nguyen, M. L., Cooper, D. A., Eldridge, A. L., Schwartz, S. J., & White, W. S. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/80.2.396 · Cited by 376
Class B Scavenger Receptor-Mediated Intestinal Absorption of Dietary β-Carotene and Cholesterol
van Bennekum, A., Werder, M., Thuahnai, S. T., Han, C.-H., Duong, P., Williams, D. L., Wettstein, P., Schulthess, G., Phillips, M. C., & Hauser, H. (2005) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi0484320 · Cited by 290
A class B scavenger receptor mediates the cellular uptake of carotenoids in Drosophila
Kiefer, C., Sumser, E., Wernet, M. F., & von Lintig, J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.162182899 · Cited by 255
Cited by
Etcheverry, P., Grusak, M. A., & Fleige, L. E. (2012) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00317 · Cited by 391
Lutein: More than just a filter for blue light
Kijlstra, A., Tian, Y., Kelly, E. R., & Berendschot, T. T. J. M. (2012) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.03.002 · Cited by 349
The complex links between dietary phytochemicals and human health deciphered by metabolomics
Manach, C., Hubert, J., Llorach, R., & Scalbert, A. (2009) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.200800516 · Cited by 218
Moran, N. E., Mohn, E. S., Hason, N., Erdman, J. W., & Johnson, E. J. (2018) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmy025 · Cited by 205
The Vitamin A–Redox Hypothesis: A Biochemical Basis for Honest Signaling via Carotenoid Pigmentation
Hill, G. E., & Johnson, J. D. (2012) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/667861 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Yonekura, L., & Nagao, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12-29
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-115
- ISSN
- 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4133
- OpenAlex
- W2058831301
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal absorption of dietary carotenoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mnfr.200600145
- The paper
- Yonekura, L., & Nagao, A. (2007). Intestinal absorption of dietary carotenoids. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200600145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.