The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Forty years of furosine – Forty years of using Maillard reaction products as indicators of the nutritional quality of foods
Abstract
The Maillard reaction products (MRPs) most widely used as markers of the nutritional quality of foods are furosine, Nε‐carboxymethyllysine (CML), hydroxymethylfurfural, pyrraline, pentosidine and pronyl‐lysine. One of the MRPs identified first was furosine, which was quantified in foods 40 years ago as a chemical indicator of the Amadori compound Nε‐fructoselysine. Since then, furosine has gained broad attention by food chemists and biomedical researchers, as its formation upon heat treatment is well characterised. Moreover, it represents the Amadori products from early Maillard reactions in which amino acids react with reducing carbohydrates, resulting in a loss of their availability. This is of importance for the essential amino acid lysine, which is also the limiting amino acid in many proteins. In order to evaluate the nutritional quality of a protein, the concomitant analysis of free – and nutritionally available – lysine and the amount of lysine reacted to form the respective MRP is essential, even for mildly processed foods. The other chemical markers of heat treatment such as CML, pyrraline, pentosidine or pronyl‐lysine seem to be useful markers of the advanced stages of Maillard reactions. Compared to the conditions in which furosine is formed, these compounds are generated under more severe conditions of heat treatment. However, the concentrations analysed are significantly lower than those of furosine. Therefore, the nutritional evaluation of a food protein should include not only furosine, but also other chemical markers of heat treatment such as, for example, CML, pyrraline and pentosidine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glomb, M. A., & Monnier, V. M. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.17.10017 · Cited by 576
Finot, P.-A., Bujard, E., Mottu, F., & Mauron, J. (1977) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9113-6_23 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Vistoli, G., De Maddis, D., Cipak, A., Zarkovic, N., Carini, M., & Aldini, G. (2013) · Free Radical Research · doi:10.3109/10715762.2013.815348 · Cited by 823
Advanced glycation endproducts in food and their effects on health
Poulsen, M. W., Hedegaard, R. V., Andersen, J. M., de Courten, B., Bügel, S., Nielsen, J., Skibsted, L. H., & Dragsted, L. O. (2013) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2013.06.052 · Cited by 751
Food Biochemistry and Food Processing
(2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118308035 · Cited by 316
Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine content of foods commonly consumed in a Western style diet
Hull, G. L. J., Woodside, J. V., Ames, J. M., & Cuskelly, G. J. (2012) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.08.055 · Cited by 263
Assar, S. H., Moloney, C., Lima, M., Magee, R., & Ames, J. M. (2009) · Amino Acids · doi:10.1007/s00726-008-0071-4 · Cited by 206
Metadata
- Authors
- Erbersdobler, H. F., & Somoza, V.
- Venue
- Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-27
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 423-430
- ISSN
- 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4133
- OpenAlex
- W2039842631
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Forty years of furosine – Forty years of using Maillard reaction products as indicators of the nutritional quality of foods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mnfr.200600154
- The paper
- Erbersdobler, H. F., & Somoza, V. (2007). Forty years of furosine – Forty years of using Maillard reaction products as indicators of the nutritional quality of foods. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200600154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.