Cited by 83Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFood composition and propertiesPhytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

UPLC-QTOF/MS metabolic profiling unveils urinary changes in humans after a whole grain rye versus refined wheat bread intervention

Bondia‐Pons, Isabel, Barri, Thaer, Hanhineva, Kati, Juntunen, Katri, Dragsted, Lars O., Mykkänen, Hannu, Poutanen, Kaisa·2013·Molecular Nutrition & Food Research

Abstract

SCOPE: Non-targeted urine metabolite profiling has not been previously exploited in the field of whole grain (WG) products. WG products, particularly rye, are important elements in a healthy Nordic diet. The aim of this study was to identify novel urinary biomarkers of WG rye bread (RB) intake in a randomised crossover study with RB versus refined wheat bread (WB). METHODS AND RESULTS: UPLC-QTOF/MS metabolite profiling was applied to urine from a 2 × 4 wk crossover intervention with RB versus WB in 20 subjects. Sixteen metabolites were revealed as major contributing biomarkers. The most discriminative metabolite after the cereal intervention was identified as 3-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-propanoic acid sulphate, which was excreted to a higher extent after the RB versus WB intervention. Other alkylresorcinol metabolites were identified, as well as enterolactone glucuronide, azelaic acid, 2-aminophenol sulphate and its benzoxazinoid precursor 2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one. Our study also suggests that nitrogen-containing metabolites are other major markers. However, other methodologies will be needed to elucidate their final structure. CONCLUSION: The present non-targeted metabolite profiling proved to be a useful approach to identify major urine metabolites discriminating RB intake from that of white wheat bread. Once validated these markers could help evaluate compliance to healthy Nordic diets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mnfr.201200571

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-resolution LC-Q-TOF MS with electrospray ionization has successfully detected compounds such as terpene metabolites, diketopiperazine metabolites, phenylvalerolactones, and benzoxazinoid metabolites, which are candidate biomarkers of food intake not easily detected by NMR or GC-MS.

    “This technique has been successful in detecting compounds such as terpene metabolites, diketopiperazine metabolites, phenylvalerolactones, and benzoxazinoid metabolites, which are interesting candidate biomarkers of food intake that would not be easily detected in biofluids by NMR or GC-MS (49,86,96).”

    From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [86]

  • The recent description of benzoxazinoids in rye helped identify some of their metabolites (2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one, 2-aminophenol sulfate, and hydroxylated phenylacetamides) in urinary profiles after rye bread consumption.

    “As an example, the recent description of benzoxazinoids in rye facilitated the identification of some of their metabolites (2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one, 2-aminophenol sulfate, and hydroxylated phenylacetamides) in urinary metabolic profiles observed after rye bread consumption (86,114).”

    From The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure (2014) · cites this paper as [86]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bondia‐Pons, I., Barri, T., Hanhineva, K., Juntunen, K., Dragsted, L. O., Mykkänen, H., & Poutanen, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Bondia‐Pons, Isabel
Venue
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-10
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
412-422
ISSN
  • 1613-4125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-4133
OpenAlex
W1996958551
Cited by
83
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Nutrition & Food Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nordic Centre of Excellence on ‘Systems biology in controlled dietary interventions and cohort studies' (070014)
  • Nordea Foundation
  • Academy of Finland
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Keywords
urinary biomarkers, dietary intervention, non-targeted metabolite profiling, azelaic acid, benzoxazinoids, nitrogen-containing metabolites
MeSH terms
Adult, Aminophenols, Bread, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phenylpropionates, Secale, Mass Spectrometry, Triticum, 4-Butyrolactone, Biomarkers, Lignans, Cross-Over Studies, Benzoxazines, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review