Cited by 515Nutritional Studies and DietFood composition and propertiesCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Whole grain intake and cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis

Mellen, Philip B., Walsh, Thomas F., Herrington, David M.·2008·Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Background and aims Whole grain food sources have been associated with lowered risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Studies in recent years have strengthened this observation and elucidated potential mechanisms for this association. This study sought to quantitate the available observational evidence on whole grain intake and clinical cardiovascular events.Methods and results Seven prospective cohort studies with quantitative measures of dietary whole grains and clinical cardiovascular outcomes were identified from MEDLINE searches and a review of the literature. Based on event estimates adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, greater whole grain intake (pooled average 2.5 servings/d vs. 0.2 servings/d) was associated with a 21% lower risk of CVD events [OR 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.85)]. Similar estimates were noted for different CVD outcomes (heart disease, stroke, fatal CVD) and in sex-specific analyses. Conversely, refined grain intake was not associated with incident CVD events [1.07 (0.94-1.22)].Conclusions There is a consistent, inverse association between dietary whole grains and incident cardiovascular disease in epidemiological cohort studies. In light of this evidence, policy-makers, scientists, and clinicians should redouble efforts to incorporate clear messages on the beneficial effects of whole grains into public health and clinical practice endeavors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.12.008

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mellen, P. B., Walsh, T. F., & Herrington, D. M.
Affiliations
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
283-290
ISSN
0939-4753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061816970
Cited by
515
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 45
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL76132, T32HL076132)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
whole grain intake, cardiovascular disease, refined grains, dietary fiber, heart disease, stroke, fatal cardiovascular events, prospective cohort, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Edible Grain, Diet, Diet Surveys, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Cohort Studies, Multicenter Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review