Cited by 81Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Development of a brief, clinically relevant, scale for measuring attachment disorders

Open access
Minnis, Helen, Rabe‐Hesketh, Sophia, Wolkind, Stephen·2002·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

A 17‐item questionnaire for reactive attachment disorders (RAD) was developed and administered to 182 Scottish children living in foster care. The RAD questionnaire had a good test‐retest reliability with an intra‐class correlation (ICC) of 0.78 and inter‐rater reliability with an ICC of 0.81. Cluster analysis showed that the children fell into three groups, two of which corresponded to the two reactive attachment disorder subtypes. High questionnaire scores for attachment disorders were significantly associated with conduct problems, emotional problems, hyperactivity and problems with peer relations and negatively associated with pro‐social behaviour. High overall questionnaire scores for reactive attachment disorder were associated with previous sexual abuse, whereas there was no association with previous physical abuse. High scores for the disinhibited subtype were associated with previous neglect. Copyright © 2002 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.127

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gaensbauer T, and Sands K. Distorted affective communica- tion in abused/neglected infants and their caretakers. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1979; 18: 236-50.
  2. Huber PJ. The behaviour of maximum liklihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1967; 1: 221-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Minnis, H., Rabe‐Hesketh, S., & Wolkind, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Maudsley Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Minnis, Helen
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
90-98
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
OpenAlex
W2152487573
Cited by
81
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
reactive attachment disorder, attachment disorders, questionnaire development, foster children, conduct problems, emotional problems, hyperactivity, peer relationships, prosocial behavior, sexual abuse, child neglect, scale reliability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Foster Home Care, Guatemala, Humans, Infant, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis, Reactive Attachment Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review