Cited by 70Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Reactive attachment disorder in looked‐after children

Millward, R., Kennedy, E., Towlson, K., Minnis, H.·2006·Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties

Abstract

The great majority of children living in foster or residential care have been abused and neglected. Mental health problems are common and the nature of these problems may be rooted in early attachment relationships. The carers of 82 children in care in Scotland and 125 children from local schools completed questionnaires on mental health problems including Reactive Attachment Disorder. More than half (53%) of the children in care fulfilled criteria for mental health problems compared with 13% of the control group, and children living in care scored significantly higher for conduct problems, emotional problems (anxiety and depression), hyperactivity, problems with peer relations and Reactive Attachment Disorder. This has important implications for service development for this vulnerable group of children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13632750601022212

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The validity and relevance of the criteria for the diagnosis of Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) have been controversial, especially regarding how these features should be characterised and assessed after the age of 5 years old.

    “In contrast to the general agreement regarding the diagnostic criteria and methods of assessment for most mental disorders in children, the validity and relevance of the criteria for the diagnosis of Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) have been more controversial, especially regarding how these features should be characterised and assessed after the age of 5 years old [17,18].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millward, R., Kennedy, E., Towlson, K., & Minnis, H.
Affiliations
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Millward, R.
Venue
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties
Published
2006-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
273-279
ISSN
  • 1363-2752 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2692
OpenAlex
W2091410305
Cited by
70
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
reactive attachment disorder, children in care, foster care, residential care, child abuse, child mental health problems, conduct problems, anxiety, depression, hyperactivity, peer relationships, attachment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review