Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diffusion tensor imaging using single‐shot SENSE‐EPI

Open access
Bammer, Roland, Auer, Martin, Keeling, Stephen L., Augustin, Michael, Stables, Lara A., Prokesch, Rupert W., Stollberger, Rudolf, Moseley, Michael E., Fazekas, Franz·2002·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) greatly enhances the quality of diffusion‐weighted echo‐planar imaging (EPI) by reducing blurring and off‐resonance artifacts. Such improvement would also be desirable for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), but measures derived from the diffusion tensor can be extremely sensitive to any kind of image distortion. Whether DTI is feasible in combination with SENSE has not yet been explored, and is the focus of this study. Using a SENSE‐reduction factor of 2, DTI scans in eight healthy volunteers were carried out with regular‐ and high‐resolution acquisition matrices. To further improve the stability of the SENSE reconstruction, a new coil‐sensitivity estimation technique based on variational calculus and the principles of matrix regularization was applied. With SENSE, maps of the trace of the diffusion tensor and of fractional anisotropy (FA) had improved spatial resolution and less geometric distortion. Overall, the geometric distortions were substantially removed and a significant resolution enhancement was achieved with almost the same scan time as regular EPI. DTI was even possible without the use of quadrature body coil (QBC) reference scans. Geometry‐factor‐related noise enhancement was only discernible in maps generated with higher‐resolution matrices. Error boundaries for residual fluctuations in SENSE reconstructions are discussed. Our results suggest that SENSE can be combined with DTI and may present an important adjunct for future neuroimaging applications of this technique. Magn Reson Med 48:128–136, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.10184

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Bammer, R., Auer, M., Keeling, S. L., Augustin, M., Stables, L. A., Prokesch, R. W., Stollberger, R., Moseley, M. E., & Fazekas, F.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-06-27
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
128-136
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2013284331
Cited by
279
References
1
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.