Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE)

Open access
Bammer, Roland, Keeling, Stephen L., Augustin, Michael, Pruessmann, Klaas P., Wolf, Roswitha, Stollberger, Rudolf, Hartung, Hans‐Peter, Fazekas, Franz·2001·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
DOI 10.1002/mrm.1226
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Diffusion‐weighted single‐shot EPI (sshEPI) is one of the most important tools for the diagnostic assessment of stroke patients, but it suffers from well known artifacts. Therefore, sshEPI was combined with SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) to further increase EPI's potential for stroke imaging. Eight healthy volunteers and a consecutive series of patients (N = 8) with suspected stroke were examined with diffusion‐weighted SENSE‐sshEPI using different reduction factors (1.0 ≤ R ≤ 3.0). Additionally, a high‐resolution diffusion‐weighted SENSE‐sshEPI scan was included. All examinations were diagnostic and of better quality than conventional sshEPI. No ghostings or aliasing artifacts were discernible, and EPI‐related image distortions were markedly diminished. Chemical shift artifacts and eddy current‐induced image warping were still present, although to a markedly smaller extent. Measured direction‐dependent diffusion‐coefficients and isotropic diffusion values were comparable to previous findings but showed less fluctuation. We have demonstrated the technical feasibility and clinical applicability of diffusion‐weighted SENSE‐sshEPI in patients with subacute stroke. Because of the faster k‐space traversal, this novel technique is able to reduce typical EPI artifacts and increase spatial resolution while simultaneously remaining insensitive to bulk motion. Magn Reson Med 46:548–554, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.1226

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Bammer, R., Keeling, S. L., Augustin, M., Pruessmann, K. P., Wolf, R., Stollberger, R., Hartung, H., & Fazekas, F.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-08-31
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
548-554
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
DOI
10.1002/mrm.1226
OpenAlex
W1967691758
Cited by
311
References
19
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.