The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transverse relaxation of solvent protons induced by magnetized spheres: Application to ferritin, erythrocytes, and magnetite
Open accessAbstract
Since 1/T2 of protons of tissue water is generally much greater than 1/T1 at typical imaging fields, small single‐ion contrast agents–such as Gd(DTPA), which make comparable incremental contributions and therefore smaller fractional contributions to 1/T2 compared to 1/T1–are not as desirable for contrast‐enhancement as agents that could enhance 1/T2 preferentially. In principle, such specialized agents will only be effective at higher fields because the field dependence (dispersion) of 1/T1 is such that it approaches zero at high fields whereas 1/T2 approaches a constant value. The residual 1/T2 is called the “secular” contribution and arises from fluctuations in time–as sensed by the protons of diffusing solvent or tissue water molecules–of the component of the magnetic field parallel to the static applied field. For solutions or suspensions of sufficiently large paramagnetic or ferromagnetic particles (⋧250 Å diameter), the paramagnetic contributions to the relaxation rates satisfy 1/T2 ≫ 1/T1 at typical imaging fields. We examine the theory of secular relaxation in some detail, particularly as it applies to systems relevant to magnetic resonance imaging, and then analyze the data for solutions, suspensions, or tissue containing ferritin, erythrocytes, agar‐bound magnetite particles, and liver with lowdensity composite polymer‐coated magnetite. In most cases we can explain the relaxation data, often quantitatively, in terms of the theory of relaxation of protons (water molecules) diffusing in the outer sphere environments of magnetized particles. The dipolar field produced by these particles has a strong spatial dependence, and its apparent fluctuations in time as seen by the diffusing protons produce spin transitions that contribute to both 1/T1 and /T2 comparably at low fields, for the larger particles, because of dispersion, the secular term dominates at fields of interest. On the basis of the agreement of theory with data for solutions of small paramagnetic complexes, large magnetite particles, and liver containing low‐density polymer‐coated magnetite agglomerates, it is argued that the theory is sufficiently reliable so that, e.g., for ferritin–for which 1/T2 is unexpectedly large–the source of its large relaxivity must reside in nonideal chemistry of the ferritin core. For blood, it appears that diffusion through intracellular gradients determines 1/T2. © 1987 Academic Press, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spin Diffusion Measurements: Spin Echoes in the Presence of a Time-Dependent Field Gradient
Stejskal, E. O., & Tanner, J. E. (1965) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1695690 · Cited by 8,286
Relaxation Effects in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Absorption
Bloembergen, N., Purcell, E. M., & Pound, R. V. (1948) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.73.679 · Cited by 6,528
Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments
Carr, H. Y., & Purcell, E. M. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.94.630 · Cited by 6,466
Modified Spin-Echo Method for Measuring Nuclear Relaxation Times
Meiboom, S., & Gill, D. (1958) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.1716296 · Cited by 6,022
Hahn, E. L. (1950) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.80.580 · Cited by 5,085
Bloch, F. (1946) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.70.460 · Cited by 3,676
Principles of Magnetic Resonance
Slichter, C. P. (1978) · Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12784-1 · Cited by 1,876
Swift, T. J., & Connick, R. E. (1962) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1701321 · Cited by 1,292
Bloch Equations with Diffusion Terms
Torrey, H. C. (1956) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.104.563 · Cited by 1,216
Thulborn, K. R., Waterton, J. C., Matthews, P. M., & Radda, G. K. (1982) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/0304-4165(82)90333-6 · Cited by 1,134
Cited by
Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging
Haacke, E. M., Cheng, N. Y. C., House, M. J., Liu, Q., Neelavalli, J., Ogg, R. J., Khan, A., Ayaz, M., Kirsch, W., & Obenaus, A. (2005) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.001 · Cited by 995
Increased basal ganglia iron levels in Huntington disease
Bartzokis, G., Cummings, J., Perlman, S., Hance, D. B., & Mintz, J. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.5.569 · Cited by 183
NMR relaxation in tissues with weak magnetic inhomogeneities
Jensen, J. H., & Chandra, R. (2000) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<144::aid-mrm21>3.0.co;2-o · Cited by 153
Magnetic Nanostructures: Rational Design and Fabrication Strategies toward Diverse Applications
Wang, S., Xu, J., Li, W., Sun, S., Gao, S., & Hou, Y. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00370 · Cited by 129
Magnetic resonance imaging of brain iron
Schenck, J. F. (2003) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00431-8 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillis, P., & Koenig, S. H.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 323-345
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2053121035
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transverse relaxation of solvent protons induced by magnetized spheres: Application to ferritin, erythrocytes, and magnetite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910050404
- The paper
- Gillis, P., & Koenig, S. H. (1987). Transverse relaxation of solvent protons induced by magnetized spheres: Application to ferritin, erythrocytes, and magnetite. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910050404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.