The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimizing the precision in T1 relaxation estimation using limited flip angles
Abstract
In this article we describe the precision in the estimation of the spin–lattice relaxation time TI from MRI signals acquired for various flip angles with the repetition time TR held constant. We review the estimation procedure itself and present a model for the propagation of noise in the signal into the calculated TI. This model is verified by both Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data taken on image phantoms. Based on this model, we find that for a given TR/TI there exist two optimal flip angles that will minimize the uncertainty in the estimated TI. We also show how two optimal angles can be selected for a given range of TR/TI values. In addition, T1 estimation using the two optimal angles can be comparable to or better than using multiple evenly spaced angles. Finally, in an initial comparison with the two‐point saturation recovery method of calculating T1, results for equal total scanning time TR Tot suggest that for T1 > 0.5 TR Tot, the limited flip angle approach gives better TI precision whereas for TI < 0.5 TR Tot, the saturation recovery approach is better. © Academic Press, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state
Deoni, S. C. L., Rutt, B. K., & Peters, T. M. (2003) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.10407 · Cited by 744
Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination
Lutti, A., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., & Weiskopf, N. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.005 · Cited by 346
Quantitative Gd‐DOTA uptake from cerebrospinal fluid into rat brain using 3D VFA‐SPGR at 9.4T
Lee, H., Mortensen, K., Sanggaard, S., Koch, P., Brunner, H., Quistorff, B., Nedergaard, M., & Benveniste, H. (2018) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.26779 · Cited by 110
Teixeira, R. P. A. G., Malik, S. J., & Hajnal, J. V. (2018) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.26670 · Cited by 39
Goldenberg, J. M., Cárdenas‐Rodríguez, J., & Pagel, M. D. (2019) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.27439 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, H. Z., Riederer, S. J., & Lee, J. N.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 399-416
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2006655725
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimizing the precision in T1 relaxation estimation using limited flip angles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910050502
- The paper
- Wang, H. Z., Riederer, S. J., & Lee, J. N. (1987). Optimizing the precision in T1 relaxation estimation using limited flip angles. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910050502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.