Cited by 110Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNMR spectroscopy and applicationsCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Quantitative Gd‐DOTA uptake from cerebrospinal fluid into rat brain using 3D VFA‐SPGR at 9.4T

Open access
Lee, Hedok, Mortensen, Kristian, Sanggaard, Simon, Koch, Palle, Brunner, Hans, Quistorff, Bjørn, Nedergaard, Maiken, Benveniste, Helene·2018·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: We propose a quantitative technique to assess solute uptake into the brain parenchyma based on dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI). With this approach, a small molecular weight paramagnetic contrast agent (Gd‐DOTA) is infused in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and whole brain gadolinium concentration maps are derived. Methods: We implemented a 3D variable flip angle spoiled gradient echo (VFA‐SPGR) longitudinal relaxation time (T1) technique, the accuracy of which was cross‐validated by way of inversion recovery rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (IR‐RARE) using phantoms. Normal Wistar rats underwent Gd‐DOTA infusion into CSF via the cisterna magna and continuous MRI for approximately 130 min using T1‐weighted imaging. Dynamic Gd‐DOTA concentration maps were calculated and parenchymal uptake was estimated. Results: In the phantom study, T1 discrepancies between the VFA‐SPGR and IR‐RARE sequences were approximately 6% with a transmit coil inhomogeneity correction. In the in vivo study, contrast transport profiles indicated maximal parenchymal retention of approximately 19% relative to the total amount delivered into the cisterna magna. Conclusion: Imaging strategies for accurate 3D contrast concentration mapping at 9.4T were developed and whole brain dynamic concentration maps were derived to study solute transport via the glymphatic system. The newly developed approach will enable future quantitative studies of the glymphatic system in health and disease states. Magn Reson Med 79:1568–1578, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.26779

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rats, from total amount of MRI contrast agent injected into cisterna magna, merely 19% enriched brain parenchyma, remainder escaped via other routes.

    “It has, however, been demonstrated in rats that from the total amount of MRI contrast agent injected into the cisterna magna, merely 19% enriched the brain parenchyma, the remainder escaped via other routes22.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H., Mortensen, K., Sanggaard, S., Koch, P., Brunner, H., Quistorff, B., Nedergaard, M., & Benveniste, H.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Section for Translational Neuroscience Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Corresponding author
Lee, Hedok
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-19
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
1568-1578
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2625314800
Cited by
110
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (NIH‐R01AG048769, NIH 1R01NS100366‐01, NIH‐RF1AG053991)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
Gd-DOTA, cerebrospinal fluid, solute transport, glymphatic system, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, T1 mapping, high-field MRI, rat brain
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Brain Mapping, Heterocyclic Compounds, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organometallic Compounds, Rats, Wistar, Phantoms, Imaging, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review