Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A comparison of one‐shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging

Crawley, Adrian P., Henkelman, R. Mark·1988·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Spin–lattice (T1) relaxation times are conventionally estimated using inversion recovery or saturation recovery sequences. Such “recovery” methods are limited in magnetic resonance imaging by the long times required to collect multiple points along the T1 relaxation curve. This problem can be overcome by the use of “one‐shot” methods, which collect all points along the relaxation curve in a single excitation. We have compared the relative efficiency of these methods, on the basis of the signal‐to‐noise ratio obtained in the calculated T1 image from an exam time of fixed duration. We have found that a one‐shot method using stimulated echoes has a poor efficiency. However, a method based on a technique first proposed by Look and Locker has an efficiency that is almost equal to the inversion recovery method and therefore possesses highly favorable properties for T1 imaging. © 1988 Academic Press, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.1910070104

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Crawley, A. P., & Henkelman, R. M.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-05
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
23-34
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2123005841
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of one‐shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910070104
The paper
Crawley, A. P., & Henkelman, R. M. (1988). A comparison of one‐shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910070104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.