The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling
Abstract
Recently, several implementations of arterial spin labeling (ASL) techniques have been developed for producing MRI images sensitive to local tissue perfusion. For quantitation of perfusion, both pulsed and continuous labeling methods potentially suffer from a number of systematic errors. In this study, a general kinetic model for the ASL signal is described that can be used to assess these errors. With appropriate assumptions, the general model reduces to models that have been used previously to analyze ASL data, but the general model also provides a way to analyze the errors that result if these assumptions are not accurate. The model was used for an initial assessment of systematic errors due to the effects of variable transit delays from the tagging band to the imaging voxel, the effects of capillary/tissue exchange of water on the relaxation of the tag, and the effects of incomplete water extraction. In preliminary experiments with a human subject, the model provided a good description of pulsed ASL data during a simple sensorimotor activation task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.
Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., Kennedy, D. N., Hoppel, B. E., Cohen, M. S., & Turner, R. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675 · Cited by 4,212
Cited by
Chowdhury, A. H., Cox, E. F., Francis, S. T., & Lobo, D. N. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318256be72 · Cited by 764
Methodology of brain perfusion imaging
Barbier, E. L., Lamalle, L., & Décorps, M. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1073 · Cited by 404
Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla
Wang, J., Alsop, D. C., Li, L., Listerud, J., Gonzalez‐At, J. B., Schnall, M. D., & Detre, J. A. (2002) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.10211 · Cited by 369
Model‐free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI
Petersen, E. T., Lim, T., & Golay, X. (2006) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20784 · Cited by 305
The effect of daily caffeine use on cerebral blood flow: How much caffeine can we tolerate?
Addicott, M. A., Yang, L. L., Peiffer, A. M., Burnett, L. R., Burdette, J. H., Chen, M. Y., Hayasaka, S., Kraft, R. A., Maldjian, J. A., & Laurienti, P. J. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20732 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Buxton, R. B., Frank, L. R., Wong, E. C., Siewert, B., Warach, S., & Edelman, R. R.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 383-396
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2125587122
- Cited by
- 1,263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.1910400308
- The paper
- Buxton, R. B., Frank, L. R., Wong, E. C., Siewert, B., Warach, S., & Edelman, R. R. (1998). A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910400308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.