Cited by 162Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentNMR spectroscopy and applications

Hepatic lipid accumulation in healthy subjects: A comparative study using spectral fat‐selective MRI and volume‐localized 1H‐MR spectroscopy

Machann, Jürgen, Thamer, Claus, Schnoedt, Birgit, Stefan, Norbert, Haring, Hans‐Ulrich, Claussen, Claus D., Fritsche, Andreas, Schick, Fritz·2006·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Fat-selective MRI was applied to assess the amount and spatial distribution of hepatic lipids (HL) in healthy subjects. The results were compared with those obtained by localized 1H-MR spectroscopy (MRS). Ninety subjects (23-63 years old) underwent single-slice fat-selective MRI with spatial-spectral excitation and volume-localized spectroscopy at 1.5 T. HLs were analyzed in ventral and dorsal regions of interest (ROIs) of the liver in fat-selective images. Spectra were evaluated using the integral signal of methylene and methyl signals. The fat-selective images showed smooth and homogeneous distribution of HL over the entire cross section of the liver. There was, however, a marked interindividual variability in the amount of HL. MRS revealed a lipid signal fraction between 0.5% and 39.3%. The fat content in the ROIs in images correlated well with the spectroscopic results (r >or= 0.95). Both techniques provide sufficient sensitivity for a reliable and quantitative assessment of liver steatosis in subjects without liver disease. 1H-MRS has a higher sensitivity compared to MRI, especially for small amounts of HL, which may be of interest for metabolic interventions. Fat-selective images provide more spatial information about fat distribution, which makes this technique suitable for clinical imaging of patients with liver disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.20825

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Machann, J., Thamer, C., Schnoedt, B., Stefan, N., Haring, H., Claussen, C. D., Fritsche, A., & Schick, F.
Affiliations
University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Machann, Jürgen
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02-27
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
913-917
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2123908001
Cited by
162
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
hepatic lipid accumulation, hepatic steatosis, 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy, healthy volunteers, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Adult, Fatty Liver, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review