The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo
Open accessAbstract
Brain water proton (1 H 2 O) longitudinal relaxation time constants (T1) were obtained from three healthy individuals at magnetic field strengths (B0) of 0.2 Tesla (T), 1.0T, 1.5T, 4.0T, and 7.0T. A 5‐mm midventricular axial slice was sampled using a modified Look‐Locker technique with 1.5 mm in‐plane resolution, and 32 time points post‐adiabatic inversion. The results confirmed that for most brain tissues, T1 values increased by more than a factor of 3 between 0.2T and 7T, and over this range were well fitted by T1 (s) = 0.583(B0)0.382, T1(s) = 0.857(B0)0.376, and T1(s) = 1.35(B0)0.340 for white matter (WM), internal GM, and blood 1 H 2 O, respectively. The ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 1 H 2 O T1 value did not change with B0, and its average value (standard deviation (SD)) across subjects and magnetic fields was 4.3 (±0.2) s. The tissue 1/T1 values at each field were well correlated with the macromolecular mass fraction, and to a lesser extent tissue iron content. The field‐dependent increases in 1 H 2 O T1 values more than offset the well‐known decrease in typical MRI contrast reagent (CR) relaxivity, and simulations predict that this leads to lower CR concentration detection thresholds with increased magnetic field. Magn Reson Med 57:308–318, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In vivo 1 H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at 7 T
Tkáč, I., Andersen, P., Adriany, G., Merkle, H., Uǧurbil, K., & Gruetter, R. (2001) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1213 · Cited by 394
Self-citation
Cited by
MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field
Marques, J. P., Kober, T., Krueger, G., van der Zwaag, W., Van de Moortele, P.-F., & Gruetter, R. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.002 · Cited by 1,453
Setsompop, K., Gagoski, B. A., Polimeni, J. R., Witzel, T., Wedeen, V. J., & Wald, L. L. (2012) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.23097 · Cited by 1,285
Uğurbil, K., Xu, J., Auerbach, E. J., Moeller, S., Vu, A. T., Duarte-Carvajalino, J. M., Lenglet, C., Wu, X., Schmitter, S., Van de Moortele, P. F., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.012 · Cited by 812
Myelin and iron concentration in the human brain: a quantitative study of MRI contrast
Stüber, C., Morawski, M., Schäfer, A., Labadie, C., Wähnert, M., Leuze, C., Streicher, M., Barapatre, N., Reimann, K., Geyer, S., et al. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.026 · Cited by 635
Weinstein, J. S., Varallyay, C. G., Dosa, E., Gahramanov, S., Hamilton, B., Rooney, W. D., Muldoon, L. L., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.192 · Cited by 500
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rooney, W. D., Johnson, G., Li, X., Cohen, E. R., Kim, S., Ugurbil, K., & Springer, C. S.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-26
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 308-318
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2113316687
- Cited by
- 652
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.21122
- The paper
- Rooney, W. D., Johnson, G., Li, X., Cohen, E. R., Kim, S., Ugurbil, K., & Springer, C. S. (2007). Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.