The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MR spectroscopy of the human brain with enhanced signal intensity at ultrashort echo times on a clinical platform at 3T and 7T
Open accessAbstract
Recently, the spin‐echo full‐intensity acquired localized (SPECIAL) spectroscopy technique was proposed to unite the advantages of short TEs on the order of milliseconds (ms) with full sensitivity and applied to in vivo rat brain. In the present study, SPECIAL was adapted and optimized for use on a clinical platform at 3T and 7T by combining interleaved water suppression (WS) and outer volume saturation (OVS), optimized sequence timing, and improved shimming using FASTMAP. High‐quality single voxel spectra of human brain were acquired at TEs below or equal to 6 ms on a clinical 3T and 7T system for six volunteers. Narrow linewidths (6.6 ± 0.6 Hz at 3T and 12.1 ± 1.0 Hz at 7T for water) and the high signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) of the artifact‐free spectra enabled the quantification of a neurochemical profile consisting of 18 metabolites with Cramér‐Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) below 20% at both field strengths. The enhanced sensitivity and increased spectral resolution at 7T compared to 3T allowed a two‐fold reduction in scan time, an increased precision of quantification for 12 metabolites, and the additional quantification of lactate with CRLB below 20%. Improved sensitivity at 7T was also demonstrated by a 1.7‐fold increase in average SNR (= peak height/root mean square [RMS]‐of‐noise) per unit‐time. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schizophrenia: glutathione deficit in cerebrospinal fluid and prefrontal cortex in vivo
Do, K. Q., Trabesinger, A. H., Kirsten‐Krüger, M., Lauer, C. J., Dydak, U., Hell, D., Holsboer, F., Boesiger, P., & Cuénod, M. (2000) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00229.x · Cited by 540
In vivo 1 H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at 7 T
Tkáč, I., Andersen, P., Adriany, G., Merkle, H., Uǧurbil, K., & Gruetter, R. (2001) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1213 · Cited by 394
Cited by
Krause, B., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00025 · Cited by 339
Lin, Y., Stephenson, M. C., Xin, L., Napolitano, A., & Morris, P. G. (2012) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.33 · Cited by 163
das Neves Duarte, J. M., Kulak, A., Gholam-Razaee, M. M., Cuenod, M., Gruetter, R., & Do, K. Q. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.035 · Cited by 124
Monin, A., Baumann, P. S., Griffa, A., Xin, L., Mekle, R., Fournier, M., Butticaz, C., Klaey, M., Cabungcal, J. H., Steullet, P., et al. (2015) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2014.88 · Cited by 113
Neurochemistry of major depression: a study using magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Godlewska, B. R., Near, J., & Cowen, P. J. (2015) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-014-3687-y · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Mekle, R., Mlynárik, V., Gambarota, G., Hergt, M., Krueger, G., & Gruetter, R.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-24
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1279-1285
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2127421809
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MR spectroscopy of the human brain with enhanced signal intensity at ultrashort echo times on a clinical platform at 3T and 7T. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.21961
- The paper
- Mekle, R., Mlynárik, V., Gambarota, G., Hergt, M., Krueger, G., & Gruetter, R. (2009). MR spectroscopy of the human brain with enhanced signal intensity at ultrashort echo times on a clinical platform at 3T and 7T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21961
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.