The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tumor imaging using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Dynamic nuclear polarization is an emerging technique for increasing the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy, particularly for low‐γ nuclei. The technique has been applied recently to a number of 13 C‐labeled cell metabolites in biological systems: the increase in signal‐to‐noise allows the spatial distribution of an injected molecule to be imaged as well as its metabolic product or products. This review highlights the most significant molecules investigated to date in preclinical cancer models, either in terms of their demonstrated metabolism in vivo or the biological processes that they can probe. In particular, label exchange between hyperpolarized 13 C‐labeled pyruvate and lactate, catalyzed by lactate dehydrogenase, has been shown to have a number of potential applications. Finally, techniques to image these molecules are also discussed as well as methods that may extend the lifetime of the hyperpolarized signal. Hyperpolarized magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging have shown great promise for the imaging of cancer in preclinical work, both for diagnosis and for monitoring therapy response. If the challenges in translating this technique to human imaging can be overcome, then it has the potential to significantly alter the management of cancer patients. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Williamson, D., Lund, P., & Krebs, H. (1967) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj1030514 · Cited by 1,871
The molecular determinants of de novo nucleotide biosynthesis in cancer cells
Tong, X., Zhao, F., & Thompson, C. B. (2009) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2009.01.002 · Cited by 351
Cited by
The return of metabolism: biochemistry and physiology of the pentose phosphate pathway
Stincone, A., Prigione, A., Cramer, T., Wamelink, M. M. C., Campbell, K., Cheung, E., Olin‐Sandoval, V., Grüning, N., Krüger, A., Tauqeer Alam, M., et al. (2015) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12140 · Cited by 1,576
Self-citationUnderstanding metabolic regulation and its influence on cell physiology
Metallo, C. M., & Vander Heiden, M. G. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.018 · Cited by 367
Keshari, K. R., & Wilson, D. M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60124b · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Brindle, K. M., Bohndiek, S. E., Gallagher, F. A., & Kettunen, M. I.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 505-519
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2053334137
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor imaging using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.22999
- The paper
- Brindle, K. M., Bohndiek, S. E., Gallagher, F. A., & Kettunen, M. I. (2011). Tumor imaging using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.