Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vivo three‐dimensional whole‐brain pulsed steady‐state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T

Open access
Jones, Craig K., Polders, Daniel, Hua, Jun, Zhu, He, Hoogduin, Hans J., Zhou, Jinyuan, Luijten, Peter, van Zijl, Peter C.M.·2012·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Abstract

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is a technique to indirectly detect pools of exchangeable protons through the water signal. To increase its applicability to human studies, it is needed to develop sensitive pulse sequences for rapidly acquiring whole‐organ images while adhering to stringent amplifier duty cycle limitations and specific absorption rate restrictions. In addition, the interfering effects of direct water saturation and conventional magnetization transfer contrast complicate CEST quantification and need to be reduced as much as possible. It is shown that for protons exchanging with rates of less than 50–100 Hz, such as imaged in amide proton transfer experiments, these problems can be addressed by using a three‐dimensional steady state pulsed acquisition of limited B1 strength (∼1 μT). Such an approach exploits the fact that the direct water saturation width, magnetization transfer contrast magnitude, and specific absorption rate increase strongly with B1, while the size of the CEST effect for such protons depends minimally on B1. A short repetition time (65 ms) steady‐state sequence consisting of a brief saturation pulse (25 ms) and a segmented echo‐planar imaging train allowed acquisition of a three‐dimensional whole‐brain volume in approximately 11 s per saturation frequency, while remaining well within specific absorption rate and duty cycle limits. Magnetization transfer contrast was strongly reduced, but substantial saturation effects were found at frequencies upfield from water, which still confound the use of magnetization transfer asymmetry analysis. Fortunately, the limited width of the direct water saturation signal could be exploited to fit it with a Lorentzian function allowing CEST quantification. Amide proton transfer effects ranged between 1.5% and 2.5% in selected white and grey matter regions. This power and time‐efficient 3D pulsed CEST acquisition scheme should aid endogenous CEST quantification at both high and low fields. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mrm.23141

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Jones, C. K., Polders, D., Hua, J., Zhu, H., Hoogduin, H. J., Zhou, J., Luijten, P., & van Zijl, P. C. M.
Venue
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-14
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
1579-1589
ISSN
  • 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2594
OpenAlex
W2054131761
Cited by
209
References
1
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo three‐dimensional whole‐brain pulsed steady‐state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.23141
The paper
Jones, C. K., Polders, D., Hua, J., Zhu, H., Hoogduin, H. J., Zhou, J., Luijten, P., & van Zijl, P. C. M. (2012). In vivo three‐dimensional whole‐brain pulsed steady‐state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23141

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.