The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Frequency and phase drift correction of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data by spectral registration in the time domain
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Frequency and phase drifts are a common problem in the acquisition of in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data. If not accounted for, frequency and phase drifts will result in artifactual broadening of spectral peaks, distortion of spectral lineshapes, and a reduction in signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). We present herein a new method for estimating and correcting frequency and phase drifts in in vivo MRS data. Methods: We used a simple method of fitting each spectral average to a reference scan (often the first average in the series) in the time domain through adjustment of frequency and phase terms. Due to the similarity with image registration, this method is referred to as “spectral registration.” Using simulated data with known frequency and phase drifts, the performance of spectral registration was compared with two existing methods at various SNR levels. Results: Spectral registration performed well in comparison with the other methods tested in terms of both frequency and phase drift estimation. Conclusions: Spectral registration provides an effective method for frequency and phase drift correction. It does not involve the collection of navigator echoes, and does not rely on any specific resonances, such as residual water or creatine, making it highly versatile. Magn Reson Med 73:44–50, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations
Wilson, M., Andronesi, O., Barker, P. B., Bartha, R., Bizzi, A., Bolan, P. J., Brindle, K. M., Choi, I., Cudalbu, C., Dydak, U., et al. (2019) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.27742 · Cited by 470
Brakedal, B., Dölle, C., Riemer, F., Ma, Y., Nido, G. S., Skeie, G. O., Craven, A. R., Schwarzlmüller, T., Brekke, N., Diab, J., et al. (2022) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2022.02.001 · Cited by 323
Reduced occipital GABA in Parkinson disease with visual hallucinations
Firbank, M. J., Parikh, J., Murphy, N., Killen, A., Allan, C. L., Collerton, D., Blamire, A. M., & Taylor, J.-P. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000006007 · Cited by 103
Linking GABA and glutamate levels to cognitive skill acquisition during development
Cohen Kadosh, K., Krause, B., King, A. J., Near, J., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22921 · Cited by 64
Self-citationSpectroscopy markers of suicidal risk and mental pain in depressed patients
Jollant, F., Near, J., Turecki, G., & Richard-Devantoy, S. (2017) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2016.10.005 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Near, J., Edden, R., Evans, C. J., Paquin, R., Harris, A., & Jezzard, P.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-01-16
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-50
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W1639707408
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency and phase drift correction of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data by spectral registration in the time domain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mrm.25094
- The paper
- Near, J., Edden, R., Evans, C. J., Paquin, R., Harris, A., & Jezzard, P. (2015). Frequency and phase drift correction of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data by spectral registration in the time domain. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.