Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 404

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Normal values for quantitative muscle ultrasonography in adults

Arts, Ilse M.P., Pillen, Sigrid, Schelhaas, H. Jurgen, Overeem, Sebastiaan, Zwarts, Machiel J.·2010·Muscle & Nerve

Abstract

Ultrasonography can detect structural muscle changes caused by neuromuscular disease. Quantitative analysis is the preferred method to determine if ultrasound findings are within normal limits, but normative data are incomplete. The purpose of this study was to provide normative muscle ultrasonography data for muscle thickness and echo intensity for five different muscle groups in adults. Bilateral scans of the sternocleidomastoid, biceps brachii/brachialis, forearm flexor group, quadriceps femoris, and tibialis anterior were made in 95 volunteers, aged 17–90 years. Both muscle thickness and echo intensity showed gender differences and a muscle‐specific non‐linear correlation with age. The muscles of the upper extremities showed right–left differences. These data demonstrate the effect of age on muscle characteristics and provide normative values that can be used in clinical practice. Muscle Nerve, 2010

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mus.21458

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Arts, I. M. P., Pillen, S., Schelhaas, H. J., Overeem, S., & Zwarts, M. J.
Venue
Muscle & Nerve
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-31
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
32-41
ISSN
  • 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4598
OpenAlex
W2110258855
Cited by
404
References
3
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.