Cited by 67Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Body composition and functional assessment of nutritional status in adults: A narrative review of imaging, impedance, strength and functional techniques

Open access
Smith, S., Madden, A. M.·2016·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

The accurate and valid assessment of body composition is essential for the diagnostic evaluation of nutritional status, identifying relevant outcome measures, and determining the effectiveness of current and future nutritional interventions. Developments in technology and our understanding of the influences of body composition on risk and outcome will provide practitioners with new opportunities to enhance current practice and to lead future improvements in practice. This is the second of a two‐part narrative review that aims to critically evaluate body composition methodology in diverse adult populations, with a primary focus on its use in the assessment and monitoring of under‐nutrition. Part one focused on anthropometric variables [Madden and Smith (2016) J Hum Nutr Diet 29: 7–25] and part two focuses on the use of imaging techniques, bioelectrical impedance analysis, markers of muscle strength and functional status, with particular reference to developments relevant to practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jhn.12372

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CT and MRI have significantly impacted the scientific understanding of body composition and its relation to disease risk and outcome.

    “The results from these imaging methods are considered the most accurate means of quantifying body composition at the tissue–organ level and have significantly impacted the scientific understanding of body composition and its relation to disease risk and outcome [51,73].”
  • Results from CT and MRI are considered the most accurate means of quantifying body composition at the tissue-organ level.

    “The results from these imaging methods are considered the most accurate means of quantifying body composition at the tissue–organ level and have significantly impacted the scientific understanding of body composition and its relation to disease risk and outcome [51,73].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S., & Madden, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Queen Margaret University (GB)
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, S.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-03
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
714-732
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W2346369611
Cited by
67
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
body composition, nutritional assessment, malnutrition, bioelectrical impedance analysis, muscle strength, functional status, adults, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Female, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Nutrition Assessment, Electric Impedance, Malnutrition, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review