Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of relative blood flow restriction pressure on muscle activation and muscle adaptation

Counts, Brittany R., Dankel, Scott J., Barnett, Brian E., Kim, Daeyeol, Mouser, J. Grant, Allen, Kirsten M., Thiebaud, Robert S., Abe, Takashi, Bemben, Michael G., Loenneke, Jeremy P.·2016·Muscle & Nerve

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the acute and chronic skeletal muscle response to differing levels of blood flow restriction (BFR) pressure. Methods: Fourteen participants completed elbow flexion exercise with pressures from 40% to 90% of arterial occlusion. Pre/post torque measurements and electromyographic (EMG) amplitude of each set were quantified for each condition. This was followed by a separate 8‐week training study of the effect of high (90% arterial occlusion) and low (40% arterial occlusion) pressure on muscle size and function. Results: For the acute study, decreases in torque were similar between pressures [–15.5 (5.9) Nm, P = 0.344]. For amplitude of the first 3 and last 3 reps there was a time effect. After training, increases in muscle size (10%), peak isotonic strength (18%), peak isokinetic torque (180°/s = 23%, 60°/s = 11%), and muscular endurance (62%) changed similarly between pressures. Conclusion: We suggest that higher relative pressures may not be necessary when exercising under BFR. Muscle Nerve 53: 438–445, 2016

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mus.24756

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1007/s00421-011-2167-x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1556/APhysiol.99.2012.3.1 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s40279-014-0288-1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01290.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/sms.12210 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s00421-012-2377-x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.01.016 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01033.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.07.029 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31812383d6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/cpf.12141 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/mus.24448 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/gerona/glu084 · DOI
  14. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052843 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/s00421-012-2502-x · DOI
  16. 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.2097 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Yasuda T, 2008, Muscle activation during low‐intensity mucle contractions with varying levels of external limb compression, J Sports Sci Med, 7, 467
  18. 10.1556/APhysiol.100.2013.4.6 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s00421-014-3073-9 · DOI
  20. 10.3389/fphys.2013.00249 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/sms.12036 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.02.023 · DOI
  23. 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.6.2740 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1991.tb11929.x · DOI
  25. 10.1556/IMAS.5.2013.2.1 · DOI

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Counts, B. R., Dankel, S. J., Barnett, B. E., Kim, D., Mouser, J. G., Allen, K. M., Thiebaud, R. S., Abe, T., Bemben, M. G., & Loenneke, J. P.
Venue
Muscle & Nerve
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-29
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
438-445
ISSN
  • 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4598
OpenAlex
W1569497618
Cited by
238
References
4
FWCI
41.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of relative blood flow restriction pressure on muscle activation and muscle adaptation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/mus.24756
The paper
Counts, B. R., Dankel, S. J., Barnett, B. E., Kim, D., Mouser, J. G., Allen, K. M., Thiebaud, R. S., Abe, T., Bemben, M. G., & Loenneke, J. P. (2016). Influence of relative blood flow restriction pressure on muscle activation and muscle adaptation. Muscle & Nerve. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24756

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.