Cited by 14Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research

What explains high life satisfaction in men living with Duchenne muscular dystrophy? A preliminary study to inform psychological intervention

Open access
Graham, Christopher D., Rose, Michael R.·2017·Muscle & Nerve

Abstract

Introduction: There are increasing numbers of men with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (mDMD). For those who struggle to live with the condition, psychological interventions may be helpful. However, it is unclear how these should be tailored for mDMD. To inform intervention, this study assessed whether 2 well‐validated psychological models (Leventhal's Self‐Regulatory Model; Psychological Flexibility Model) could explain variation in life satisfaction (LS). Methods: Sixteen mDMD, aged 18–43 years, completed an online survey comprised of questionnaire measures of LS, mood, and both psychological models: Illness Perceptions (Leventhal's Self‐Regulatory Model); engagement in meaningful activity, and acceptance/awareness of difficult thoughts and feelings (Psychological Flexibility Model). A median split enabled comparison of high and low LS groups. Results: Those with higher LS were characterized by the ability to undertake personally meaningful activity in acceptance of difficult thoughts and feelings. Conclusions: Results supported the Psychological Flexibility Model. However, methodological limitations mean that these findings should be considered preliminary. Muscle Nerve 56: 163–166, 2017.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mus.25495

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence that ACT processes such as psychological flexibility predict functioning and quality of life in MND and other progressive, incurable and/or life-limiting conditions, including muscle disorders, Duchenne muscular dystrophy and palliative care populations.

    “there is evidence that ACT processes such as psychological flexibility predict functioning and quality of life in MND [25] and other progressive, incurable and/or life-limiting conditions, including muscle disorders [26–28], Duchenne muscular dystrophy [29] and palliative care populations [30].”

    From A randomised controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy plus usual care compared to usual care alone for improving psychological health in people with motor neuron disease (COMMEND): study protocol. (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results report that psychological-flexibility measures differentiated men with Duchenne muscular dystrophy who had high versus low life satisfaction. The study does not establish that these processes predict functioning, and its group comparison does not establish prospective prediction of quality of life. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham, C. D., & Rose, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • King's College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Graham, Christopher D.
Venue
Muscle & Nerve
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-31
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
163-166
ISSN
  • 0148-639X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4598
OpenAlex
W2560816310
Cited by
14
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Muscle & Nerve (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Keywords
Duchenne muscular dystrophy, life satisfaction, psychological flexibility, self-regulatory model, illness perception, meaningful activities, psychological intervention, mood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Online Systems, Personal Satisfaction, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Case-Control Studies, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review