Cited by 58Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Pelvic‐Floor‐Muscle Training Adherence: Tools, Measurements and Strategies—2011 ICS State‐of‐the‐Science Seminar Research Paper II of IV

Dumoulin, Chantal, Alewijnse, Dianne, Bo, Kari, Hagen, Suzanne, Stark, Diane, Van Kampen, Marijke, Herbert, Julia, Hay‐Smith, Jean +3 more·2015·Neurourology and Urodynamics

Abstract

Aims: This paper on pelvic‐floor‐muscle training (PFMT) adherence, the second of four from the International Continence Society's 2011 State‐of‐the‐Science Conference, aims to (1) identify and collate current adherence outcome measures, (2) report the determinants of adherence, (3) report on PFMT adherence strategies, and (4) make actionable clinical and research recommendations. Method: Data were amassed from a literature review and an expert panel (2011 conference), following consensus statement methodology. Experts in pelvic floor dysfunction collated and synthesized the evidence and expert opinions on PFMT adherence for urinary incontinence (UI) and lower bowel dysfunction in men and women and pelvic organ prolapse in women. Results: The literature was scarce for most of the studied populations except for limited research on women with UI. Outcome measures: Exercise diaries were the most widely‐used adherence outcome measure, PFMT adherence was inconsistently monitored and inadequately reported. Determinants: Research, mostly secondary analyses of RCTs, suggested that intention to adhere, self‐efficacy expectations, attitudes towards the exercises, perceived benefits and a high social pressure to engage in PFMT impacted adherence. Strategies: Few trials studied and compared adherence strategies. A structured PFMT programme, an enthusiastic physiotherapist, audio prompts, use of established theories of behavior change, and user‐consultations seem to increase adherence. Conclusion: The literature on adherence outcome measures, determinants and strategies remains scarce for the studied populations with PFM dysfunction, except in women with UI. Although some current adherence findings can be applied to clinical practice, more effective and standardized research is urgently needed across all the sub‐populations. Neurourol. Urodynam. 34:???–???, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/nau.22794

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to the International Continence Society State-of-the-Science report, key modifiable determinants of adherence include self-efficacy, positive intention to adhere, perceived benefits of the exercises, attitudes toward treatment, and integration of PFMT into daily activities.

    “According to the International Continence Society State-of-the-Science report [62], key modifiable determinants of adherence include self-efficacy, positive intention to adhere, perceived benefits of the exercises, attitudes toward treatment, and integration of PFMT into daily activities.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumoulin, C., Alewijnse, D., Bo, K., Hagen, S., Stark, D., Van Kampen, M., Herbert, J., Hay‐Smith, J., Frawley, H., McClurg, D., & Dean, S.
Affiliations
  • School of Rehabilitation Faculty of Medicine University of Montreal Montreal Canada
  • Gelre Hospitals (NL)
  • Departement of Sports Medicine Norwegian School of Sport Sciences Oslo Norway
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences K.U. Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • University of Bradford (GB)
  • Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit University of Otago Wellington New Zealand
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-21
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
615-621
ISSN
  • 0733-2467 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6777
OpenAlex
W1928991918
Cited by
57
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurourology and Urodynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
International Continence Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, exercise adherence, urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, self-efficacy, social pressure, behaviour change theory, physiotherapy, audio prompts, exercise diary
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Patient Compliance, Urinary Incontinence, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Floor, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review