Cited by 241Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUterine Myomas and Treatments

Can pelvic floor muscle training reverse pelvic organ prolapse and reduce prolapse symptoms? An assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial

Brækken, Ingeborg Hoff, Majida, Memona, Engh, Marie Ellström, Bø, Kari·2010·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in reversing pelvic organ prolapse and alleviating symptoms.Study design This assessor-blinded, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial conducted at a university hospital and a physical therapy clinic randomly assigned 109 women with prolapse stages I, II, and III to pelvic floor muscle training (n = 59) or control (n = 50). Both groups received lifestyle advices and learned "the Knack." In addition, pelvic floor muscle training comprised individual physical therapy sessions and home exercise. Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, odds ratio, and effect size were used to compare groups.Results Eleven (19%) women in the pelvic floor muscle training group improved 1 Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage vs 4 (8%) controls (P = .035). Compared with controls, the pelvic floor muscle training group elevated the bladder (difference: 3.0 mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.4; P < .001) and rectum (5.5 mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-7.3; P = .022) and reduced frequency and bother of symptoms compared with controls.Conclusion Pelvic floor muscle training is without adverse effects and can be used as treatment for prolapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.037

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brækken, I. H., Majida, M., Engh, M. E., & Bø, K.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
  • Akershus University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Brækken, Ingeborg Hoff
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
203
Issue
2
Pages
170.e1-170.e7
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068925803
Cited by
241
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
11.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Norske Kvinners Sanitetsforening
  • EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse symptoms, cystocele, rectal prolapse, pelvic floor physiotherapy, home-based exercise, lifestyle advice, women's health
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitals, University, Humans, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Norway, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Ultrasonography, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Floor, Muscle, Skeletal, Risk Assessment, Cross-Over Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review