Cited by 85Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial

Stüpp, Liliana, Resende, Ana Paula Magalhães, Oliveira, Emerson, Castro, Rodrigo Aquino, Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello, Sartori, Marair Gracio Ferreira·2011·International Urogynecology Journal

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis This pilot study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.Methods Thirty-seven women with stage II prolapse were randomized to either the intervention group (n = 21) or the control group (n = 16). The evaluation included assessments of pelvic floor muscle function and surface electromyography at baseline and post 14 weeks of treatment. The severity of prolapse was quantified by the POP-Q method and symptoms by P-QoL questionnaire.Results The intervention group showed significantly greater anatomic improvements in the anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapses than did the control group (P < 0.001 and 0.025, respectively) and a decrease of symptoms. In addition, the intervention group had greater improvements in muscle strength (P < 0.001), endurance (P < 0.001), and electromyography parameters (P = 0.008) compared to the control group.Conclusions PFMT is effective in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00192-011-1428-x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stüpp, L., Resende, A. P. M., Oliveira, E., Castro, R. A., Girão, M. J. B. C., & Sartori, M. G. F.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Stüpp, Liliana
Venue
International Urogynecology Journal
Published
2011-04-12
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1233-1239
ISSN
  • 0937-3462 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-3023
OpenAlex
W2064440022
Cited by
85
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Urogynecology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNIFESP Institutional Repository (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, pelvic organ prolapse, pelvic floor muscle strength, muscular endurance, surface electromyography, POP-Q, vaginal wall prolapse, women's health
MeSH terms
Electromyography, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Quality of Life, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Pelvic Floor, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review